Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature
Thomas H. Huxley

This etext was prepared by Amy E. Zelmer.


by Thomas H. Huxley


[entire page is illustration with caption as follows]

Skeletons of the
'Photographically reduced from Diagrams of the natural size (except
that of the Gibbon, which was twice as large as nature), drawn by
Mr. Waterhouse Hawkins from specimens in the Museum of the Royal
College of Surgeons.


Ancient traditions, when tested by the severe processes of modern
investigation, commonly enough fade away into mere dreams: but it is
singular how often the dream turns out to have been a half-waking one,
presaging a reality. Ovid foreshadowed the discoveries of the
geologist: the Atlantis was an imagination, but Columbus found a western
world: and though the quaint forms of Centaurs and Satyrs have an
existence only in the realms of art, creatures approaching man more
nearly than they in essential structure, and yet as thoroughly brutal
as the goat's or horse's half of the mythical compound, are now not
only known, but notorious.

I have not met with any notice of one of these MAN-LIKE APES of earlier
date than that contained in Pigafetta's 'Description of the Kingdom of
Congo,'* drawn up from the notes of a Portuguese sailor, Eduardo Lopez,
and published in 1598. The tenth chapter of this work is entitled "De
Animalibus quae in hac provincia reperiuntur," and contains a brief
passage to the effect that "in the Songan country, on the banks of the
Zaire, there are multitudes of apes, which afford great delight to the
nobles by imitating human gestures." As this might apply to almost any
kind of apes, I should have thought little of it, had not the brothers
De Bry, whose engravings illustrate the work, thought fit, in their
eleventh 'Argumentum,' to figure two of these "Simiae magnatum
deliciae." So much of the plate as contains these apes is faithfully
copied in the woodcut (Fig. 1), and it will be observed that they are
tail-less, long-armed, and large-eared; and about the size of
Chimpanzees. It may be that these apes are as much figments of the
imagination of the ingenious brothers as the winged, two-legged,
crocodile-headed dragon which adorns the same plate; or, on the other
hand, it may be that the artists have constructed their drawings from
some essentially faithful description of a Gorilla or a Chimpanzee.
And, in either case, though these figures are worth a passing notice,
the oldest trustworthy and definite accounts of any animal of this kind
date from the 17th century, and are due to an Englishman.

APPELLATUR, per Philippum Pigafettam, olim ex Edoardo Lopez
acroamatis lingua Italica excerpta, num Latio sermone
donata ab August. Cassiod. Reinio. Iconibus et
imaginibus rerum memorabilium quasi vivis, opera et
industria Joan. Theodori et Joan. Israelis de Bry, fratrum
exornata. Francofurti, MDXCVIII.


The first edition of that most amusing old book, 'Purchas his
Pilgrimage,' was published in 1613, and therein are to be found many
references to the statements of one whom Purchas terms "Andrew Battell
(my neere neighbour, dwelling at Leigh in Essex) who served under
Manuel Silvera Perera, Governor under the King of Spaine, at his city of
Saint Paul, and with him went farre into the countrey of Angola"; and
again, "my friend, Andrew Battle, who lived in the kingdom of Congo
many yeares," and who, "upon some quarell betwixt the Portugals (among
whom he was a sergeant of a band) and him, lived eight or nine moneths
in the woodes." From this weather-beaten old soldier, Purchas was
amazed to hear "of a kinde of Great Apes, if they might so bee termed,
of the height of a man, but twice as bigge in feature of their limmes,
with strength proportionable, hairie all over, otherwise altogether like
men and women in their whole bodily shape.* They lived on such wilde
fruits as the trees and woods yielded, and in the night time lodged on
the trees."

[footnote] *"Except this that their legges had no
calves."--[Ed. 1626.] And in a marginal note, "These great
apes are called Pongo's."

This extract is, however, less detailed and clear in its statements than
a passage in the third chapter of the second part of another
work--'Purchas his Pilgrimes,' published in 1625, by the same
author--which has been often, though hardly ever quite rightly, cited.
The chapter is entitled, "The strange adventures of Andrew Battell, of
Leigh in Essex, sent by the Portugals prisoner to Angola, who lived
there and in the adioining regions neere eighteene yeeres." And the
sixth section of this chapter is headed--"Of the Provinces of Bongo,
Calongo, Mayombe, Manikesocke, Motimbas: of the Ape Monster Pongo,
their hunting: Idolatries; and divers other observations."

"This province (Calongo) toward the east bordereth upon Bongo, and
toward the north upon Mayombe, which is nineteen leagues from Longo
along the coast.

"This province of Mayombe is all woods and groves, so over-growne that a
man may travaile twentie days in the shadow without any sunne or heat.
Here is no kind of corne nor graine, so that the people liveth onely
upon plantanes and roots of sundrie sorts, very good; and nuts; nor any
kinde of tame cattell, nor hens.

"But they have great store of elephant's flesh, which they greatly
esteeme, and many kinds of wild beasts; and great store of fish. Here
is a great sandy bay, two leagues to the northward of Cape Negro,*
which is the port of Mayombe. Sometimes the Portugals lade logwood in
this bay. Here is a great river, called Banna: in the winter it hath
no barre, because the generall winds cause a great sea. But when the
sunne hath his south declination, then a boat may goe in; for then it
is smooth because of the raine. This river is very great, and hath many
ilands and people dwelling in them. The woods are so covered with
baboones, monkies, apes and parrots, that it will feare any man to
travaile in them alone. Here are also two kinds of monsters, which are
common in these woods, and very dangerous.

[footnote] *'Purchas' note'.--Cape Negro is in 16 degrees
south of the line.

"The greatest of these two monsters is called Pongo in their language,
and the lesser is called Engeco. This Pongo is in all proportion like
a man; but that he is more like a giant in stature than a man; for he
is very tall, and hath a man's face, hollow-eyed, with long haire upon
his browes. His face and eares are without haire, and his hands also.
His bodie is full of haire, but not very thicke; and it is of a dunnish

"He differeth not from a man but in his legs; for they have no calfe.
Hee goeth alwaies upon his legs, and carrieth his hands clasped in the
nape of his necke when he goeth upon the ground. They sleepe in the
trees, and build shelters for the raine. They feed upon fruit that
they find in the woods, and upon nuts, for they eate no kind of flesh.
They cannot speake, and have no understanding more than a beast. The
people of the countrie, when they travaile in the woods make fires
where they sleepe in the night; and in the morning when they are gone,
the Pongoes will come and sit about the fire till it goeth out; for
they have no understanding to lay the wood together. They goe many
together and kill many negroes that travaile in the woods. Many times
they fall upon the elephants which come to feed where they be, and so
beate them with their clubbed fists, and pieces of wood, that they will
runne roaring away from them. Those Pongoes are never taken alive
because they are so strong, that ten men cannot hold one of them; but
yet they take many of their young ones with poisoned arrowes.

"The young Pongo hangeth on his mother's belly with his hands fast
clasped about her, so that when the countrie people kill any of the
females they take the young one, which hangeth fast upon his mother.

"When they die among themselves, they cover the dead with great heaps of
boughs and wood, which is commonly found in the forest."*

[footnote] *Purchas' marginal note, p. 982:--"The Pongo a
giant ape. He told me in conference with him, that one of
these pongoes tooke a negro boy of his which lived a moneth
with them. For they hurt not those which they surprise at
unawares, except they look on them; which he avoyded. He
said their highth was like a man's, but their bignesse
twice as great. I saw the negro boy. What the other
monster should be he hath forgotten to relate; and these
papers came to my hand since his death, which, otherwise,
in my often conferences, I might have learned. Perhaps he
meaneth the Pigmy Pongo killers mentioned."

It does not appear difficult to identify the exact region of which
Battell speaks. Longo is doubtless the name of the place usually
spelled Loango on our maps. Mayombe still lies some nineteen leagues
northward from Loango, along the coast; and Cilongo or Kilonga,
Manikesocke, and Motimbas are yet registered by geographers. The Cape
Negro of Battell, however, cannot be the modern Cape Negro in 16
degrees S., since Loango itself is in 4 degrees S. latitude. On the
other hand, the "great river called Banna" corresponds very well with
the "Camma" and "Fernand Vas," of modern geographers, which form a great
delta on this part of the African coast.

Now this "Camma" country is situated about a degree and a-half south of
the Equator, while a few miles to the north of the line lies the
Gaboon, and a degree or so north of that, the Money River--both well
known to modern naturalists as localities where the largest of man-like
Apes has been obtained. Moreover, at the present day, the word Engeco,
or N'schego, is applied by the natives of these regions to the smaller
of the two great Apes which inhabit them; so that there can be no
rational doubt that Andrew Battell spoke of that which he knew of his
own knowledge, or, at any rate, by immediate report from the natives of
Western Africa. The "Engeco," however, is that "other monster" whose
nature Battell "forgot to relate," while the name "Pongo"--applied to
the animal whose characters and habits are so fully and carefully
described--seems to have died out, at least in its primitive form and
signification. Indeed, there is evidence that not only in Battell's
time, but up to a very recent date, it was used in a totally different
sense from that in which he employs it.

For example, the second chapter of Purchas' work, which I have just
quoted, contains "A Description and Historicall Declaration of the
Golden Kingdom of Guinea, etc. etc. Translated from the Dutch, and
compared also with the Latin," wherein it is stated (p. 986) that--

"The River Gaboon lyeth about fifteen miles northward from Rio de Angra,
and eight miles northward from Cape de Lope Gonsalves (Cape Lopez), and
is right under the Equinoctial line, about fifteene miles from St.
Thomas, and is a great land, well and easily to be knowne. At the mouth
of the river there lieth a sand, three or foure fathoms deepe, whereon
it beateth mightily with the streame which runneth out of the river
into the sea. This river, in the mouth thereof, is at least four miles
broad; but when you are about the Iland called 'Pongo', it is not above
two miles broad.... On both sides the river there standeth many
trees.... The Iland called 'Pongo', which hath a monstrous high hill."

FIG 2.--The Orang of Tulpius, 1641.

The French naval officers, whose letters are appended to the late M.
Isidore Geoff. Saint Hilaire's excellent essay on the Gorilla*, note in
similar terms the width of the Gaboon, the trees that line its banks
down to the water's edge, and the strong current that sets out of it.
They describe two islands in its estuary;--one low, called Perroquet;
the other high, presenting three conical hills, called Coniquet; and
one of them, M. Franquet, expressly states that, formerly, the Chief of
Coniquet was called 'Meni-Pongo', meaning thereby Lord of 'Pongo'; and
that the 'N'Pongues' (as, in agreement with Dr. Savage, he affirms the
natives call themselves) term the estuary of the Gaboon itself

[footnote] *'Archives du Museum', tome x.

It is so easy, in dealing with savages, to misunderstand their
applications of words to things, that one is at first inclined to
suspect Battell of having confounded the name of this region, where his
"greater monster" still abounds, with the name of the animal itself.
But he is so right about other matters (including the name of the
"lesser monster") that one is loth to suspect the old traveller of
error; and, on the other hand, we shall find that a voyager of a hundred
years' later date speaks of the name "Boggoe," as applied to a great
Ape, by the inhabitants of quite another part of Africa--Sierra Leone.

But I must leave this question to be settled by philologers and
travellers; and I should hardly have dwelt so long upon it except for
the curious part played by this word 'Pongo'in the later history of the
man-like Apes.

The generation which succeeded Battell saw the first of the man-like
Apes which was ever brought to Europe, or, at any rate, whose visit
found a historian. In the third book of Tulpius' 'Observationes
Medicae', published in 1641, the 56th chapter or section is devoted to
what he calls 'Satyrus indicus', "called by the Indians Orang-autang or
Man-of-the-Woods, and by the Africans Quoias Morrou." He gives a very
good figure, evidently from the life, of the specimen of this animal,
"nostra memoria ex Angola delatum," presented to Frederick Henry Prince
of Orange. Tulpius says it was as big as a child of three years old,
and as stout as one of six years: and that its back was covered with
black hair. It is plainly a young Chimpanzee.

In the meanwhile, the existence of other, Asiatic, man-like Apes became
known, but at first in a very mythical fashion. Thus Bontius (1658)
gives an altogether fabulous and ridiculous account and figure of an
animal which he calls "Orang-outang"; and though he says "vidi Ego
cujus effigiem hic exhibeo," the said effigies (see Fig. 6 for Hoppius'
copy of it) is nothing but a very hairy woman of rather comely aspect,
and with proportions and feet wholly human. The judicious English
anatomist, Tyson, was justified in saying of this description by
Bontius, "I confess I do mistrust the whole representation."

It is to the last mentioned writer, and his coadjutor Cowper, that we
owe the first account of a man-like ape which has any pretensions to
scientific accuracy and completeness. The treatise entitled,
"'Orang-outang, sive Homo Sylvestris'; or the Anatomy of a Pygmie
compared with that of a 'Monkey', an 'Ape', and a 'Man'," published by
the Royal Society in 1699, is, indeed, a work of remarkable merit, and
has, in some respects, served as a model to subsequent inquirers. This
"Pygmie," Tyson tells us "was brought from Angola, in Africa; but was
first taken a great deal higher up the country"; its hair "was of a
coal-black colour and strait," and "when it went as a quadruped on all
four, 'twas awkwardly; not placing the palm of the hand flat to the
ground, but it walk'd upon its knuckles, as I observed it to do when
weak and had not strength enough to support its body."--"From the top
of the head to the heel of the foot, in a strait line, it measured
twenty-six inches."

FIGS. 3 and 4.--The 'Pygmie' reduced from Tyson's figures 1 and 2,

These characters, even without Tyson's good figures (Figs. 3 and 4),
would have been sufficient to prove his "Pygmie" to be a young
Chimpanzee. But the opportunity of examining the skeleton of the very
animal Tyson anatomised having most unexpectedly presented itself to
me, I am able to bear independent testimony to its being a veritable
'Troglodytes niger'*, though still very young. Although fully
appreciating the resemblances between his Pygmie and Man, Tyson by no
means overlooked the differences between the two, and he concludes his
memoir by summing up first, the points in which "the Ourang-outang or
Pygmie more resembled a Man than Apes and Monkeys do," under
forty-seven distinct heads; and then giving, in thirty-four similar
brief paragraphs, the respects in which "the Ourang-outang or Pygmie
differ'd from a Man and resembled more the Ape and Monkey kind."

[footnote] * I am indebted to Dr. Wright, of Cheltenham,
whose paleontological labours are so well known, for
bringing this interesting relic to my knowledge. Tyson's
granddaughter, it appears, married Dr. Allardyce, a
physician of repute in Cheltenham, and brought, as part of
her dowry, the skeleton of the 'Pygmie.' Dr. Allardyce
presented it to the Cheltenham Museum, and, through the good
offices of my friend Dr. Wright, the authorities of the
Museum have permitted me to borrow, what is, perhaps its
most remarkable ornament.

After a careful survey of the literature of the subject extant in his
time, our author arrives at the conclusion that his "Pygmie" is
identical neither with the Orangs of Tulpius and Bontius, nor with the
Quoias Morrou of Dapper (or rather of Tulpius), the Barris of d'Arcos,
nor with the Pongo of Battell; but that it is a species of ape probably
identical with the Pygmies of the Ancients, and, says Tyson, though it
"does so much resemble a 'Man' in many of its parts, more than any of
the ape kind, or any other 'animal' in the world, that I know of: yet by
no means do I look upon it as the product of a 'mixt' generation--'tis
a 'Brute-Animal sui generis', and a particular 'species of Ape'."

The name of "Chimpanzee," by which one of the African Apes is now so
well known, appears to have come into use in the first half of the
eighteenth century, but the only important addition made, in that
period, to our acquaintance with the man-like apes of Africa is
contained in 'A New Voyage to Guinea', by William Smith, which bears the
date 1744.

In describing the animals of Sierra Leone, p. 51, this writer says:--

"I shall next describe a strange sort of animal, called by the white men
in this country Mandrill*, but why it is so called I know not, nor did
I ever hear the name before, neither can those who call them so tell,
except it be for their near resemblance of a human creature, though
nothing at all like an Ape. Their bodies, when full grown, are as big
in circumference as a middle-sized man's--their legs much shorter, and
their feet larger; their arms and hands in proportion. The head is
monstrously big, and the face broad and flat, without any other hair
but the eyebrows; the nose very small, the mouth wide, and the lips
thin. The face, which is covered by a white skin, is monstrously ugly,
being all over wrinkled as with old age; the teeth broad and yellow;
the hands have no more hair than the face, but the same white skin,
though all the rest of the body is covered with long black hair, like a
bear. They never go upon all fours, like apes; but cry, when vexed or
teased, just like children...."

[footnote] *"Mandrill" seems to signify a "man-like ape,"
the word "Drill" or "Dril" having been anciently employed
in England to denote an Ape or Baboon. Thus in the fifth
edition of Blount's "Glossographia, or a Dictionary
interpreting the hard words of whatsoever language now used
in our refined English tongue...very useful for all such as
desire to understand what they read," published in 1681, I
find, "Dril--a stone-cutter's tool wherewith he bores
little holes in marble, etc. Also a large overgrown Ape
and Baboon, so called." "Drill" is used in the same sense
in Charleton's "Onomasticon Zoicon," 1668. The singular
etymology of the word given by Buffon seems hardly a
probable one.

FIG. 5.--Facsimile of William Smith's figure of the "Mandrill," 1744.

"When I was at Sherbro, one Mr. Cummerbus, whom I shall have occasion
hereafter to mention, made me a present of one of these strange
animals, which are called by the natives Boggoe: it was a she-cub, of
six months' age, but even then larger than a Baboon. I gave it in
charge to one of the slaves, who knew how to feed and nurse it, being a
very tender sort of animal; but whenever I went off the deck the
sailors began to teaze it--some loved to see its tears and hear it cry;
others hated its snotty nose; one who hurt it, being checked by the
negro that took care of it, told the slave he was very fond of his
country-woman, and asked him if he should not like her for a wife? To
which the slave very readily replied, 'No, this no my wife; this a
white woman--this fit wife for you.' This unlucky wit of the negro's, I
fancy, hastened its death, for next morning it was found dead under the

William Smith's 'Mandrill,' or 'Boggoe,' as his description and figure
testify, was, without doubt, a Chimpanzee.

FIG. 6.--The Anthropomorpha of Linnaeus.

Linnaeus knew nothing, of his own observation, of the man-like Apes of
either Africa or Asia, but a dissertation by his pupil Hoppius in the
'Amoenitates Academicae' (VI. 'Anthropomorpha') may be regarded as
embodying his views respecting these animals.

The dissertation is illustrated by a plate, of which the accompanying
woodcut, Fig, 6, is a reduced copy, The figures are entitled (from
left to right) 1. 'Troglodyta Bontii'; 2. 'Lucifer Aldrovandi'; 3.
'Satyrus Tulpii'; 4. 'Pygmaeus Edwardi'. The first is a bad copy of
Bontius' fictitious 'Ourang-outang,' in whose existence, however,
Linnaeus appears to have fully believed; for in the standard edition of
the 'Systema Naturae', it is enumerated as a second species of Homo;
"H. nocturnus." 'Lucifer Aldrovandi' is a copy of a figure in
Aldrovandus, 'De Quadrupedibus digitatis viviparis', Lib. 2, p. 249
(1645), entitled "Cercopithecus formae rarae 'Barbilius' vocatus et
originem a china ducebat." Hoppius is of opinion that this may be one
of that cat-tailed people, of whom Nicolaus Koping affirms that they eat
a boat's crew, "gubernator navis" and all! In the 'Systema Naturae'
Linnaeus calls it in a note, 'Homo caudatus', and seems inclined to
regard it as a third species of man. According to Temminck, 'Satyrus
Tulpii' is a copy of the figure of a Chimpanzee published by Scotin in
1738, which I have not seen. It is the 'Satyrus indicus' of the
'Systema Naturae', and is regarded by Linnaeus as possibly a distinct
species from 'Satyrus sylvestris'. The last, named 'Pygmaeus Edwardi',
is copied from the figure of a young "Man of the Woods," or true
Orang-Utan, given in Edwards' 'Gleanings of Natural History' (1758).

Buffon was more fortunate than his great rival. Not only had he the
rare opportunity of examining a young Chimpanzee in the living state,
but he became possessed of an adult Asiatic man-like Ape--the first and
the last adult specimen of any of these animals brought to Europe for
many years. With the valuable assistance of Daubenton, Buffon gave an
excellent description of this creature, which, from its singular
proportions, he termed the long-armed Ape, or Gibbon. It is the modern
'Hylobates lar'.

Thus when, in 1766, Buffon wrote the fourteenth volume of his great
work, he was personally familiar with the young of one kind of African
man-like Ape, and with the adult of an Asiatic species--while the
Orang-Utan and the Mandrill of Smith were known to him by report.
Furthermore, the Abbe Prevost had translated a good deal of Purchas'
Pilgrims into French, in his 'Histoire generale des Voyages' (1748),
and there Buffon found a version of Andrew Battell's account of the
Pongo and the Engeco. All these data Buffon attempts to weld together
into harmony in his chapter entitled "Les Orang-outangs ou le Pongo et
le Jocko." To this title the following note is appended:--

"Orang-outang nom de cet animal aux Indes orientales: Pongo nom de cet
animal a Lowando Province de Congo.

"Jocko, Enjocko, nom de cet animal a Congo que nous avons adopte. 'En'
est l'article que nous avons retranche."

Thus it was that Andrew Battell's "Engeco" became metamorphosed into
"Jocko," and, in the latter shape, was spread all over the world, in
consequence of the extensive popularity of Buffon's works. The Abbe
Prevost and Buffon between them, however, did a good deal more
disfigurement to Battell's sober account than 'cutting off an article.'
Thus Battell's statement that the Pongos "cannot speake, and have no
understanding more than a beast," is rendered by Buffon "qu'il ne peut
parler 'quoiqu'il ait plus d'entendement que les autres animaux'"; and
again, Purchas' affirmation, "He told me in conference with him, that
one of these Pongos tooke a negro boy of his which lived a moneth with
them," stands in the French version, "un pongo lui enleva un petit
negre qui passa un 'an' entier dans la societe de ces animaux."

After quoting the account of the great Pongo, Buffon justly remarks,
that all the 'Jockos' and 'Orangs' hitherto brought to Europe were
young; and he suggests that, in their adult condition, they might be as
big as the Pongo or 'great Orang'; so that, provisionally, he regarded
the Jockos, Orangs, and Pongos as all of one species. And perhaps this
was as much as the state of knowledge at the time warranted. But how
it came about that Buffon failed to perceive the similarity of Smith's
'Mandrill' to his own 'Jocko,' and confounded the former with so
totally different a creature as the blue-faced Baboon, is not so easily

Twenty years later Buffon changed his opinion,* and expressed his belief
that the Orangs constituted a genus with two species,--a large one, the
Pongo of Battell, and a small one, the Jocko: that the small one
(Jocko) is the East Indian Orang; and that the young animals from
Africa, observed by himself and Tulpius, are simply young Pongos.

[footnote] *'Histoire Naturelle', Suppl. tome 7eme, 1789.

In the meanwhile, the Dutch naturalist, Vosmaer, gave, in 1778, a very
good account and figure of a young Orang, brought alive to Holland, and
his countryman, the famous anatomist, Peter Camper, published (1779) an
essay on the Orang-Utan of similar value to that of Tyson on the
Chimpanzee. He dissected several females and a male, all of which, from
the state of their skeleton and their dentition, he justly supposes to
have been young. However, judging by the analogy of man, he concludes
that they could not have exceeded four feet in height in the adult
condition. Furthermore, he is very clear as to the specific
distinctness of the true East Indian Orang.

"The Orang," says he, "differs not only from the Pigmy of Tyson and from
the Orang of Tulpius by its peculiar colour and its long toes, but also
by its whole external form. Its arms, its hands, and its feet are
longer, while the thumbs, on the contrary, are much shorter, and the
great toes much smaller in proportion."* And again, "The true Orang,
that is to say, that of Asia, that of Borneo, is consequently not the
Pithecus, or tailless Ape, which the Greeks, and especially Galen, have
described. It is neither the Pongo nor the Jocko, nor the Orang of
Tulpius, nor the Pigmy of Tyson,--'it is an animal of a peculiar
species', as I shall prove in the clearest manner by the organs of
voice and the skeleton in the following chapters" (l. c. p. 64).

[footnote] *Camper, 'Oeuvres', i. p. 56.

A few years later, M. Radermacher, who held a high office in the
Government of the Dutch dominions in India, and was an active member of
the Batavian Society of Arts and Sciences, published, in the second
part of the Transactions of that Society,* a Description of the Island
of Borneo, which was written between the years 1779 and 1781, and, among
much other interesting matter, contains some notes upon the Orang. The
small sort of Orang-Utan, viz. that of Vosmaer and of Edwards, he
says, is found only in Borneo, and chiefly about Banjermassing,
Mampauwa, and Landak. Of these he had seen some fifty during his
residence in the Indies; but none exceeded 2 1/2 feet in length. The
larger sort, often regarded as a chimaera, continues Radermacher, would
perhaps long have remained so, had it not been for the exertions of the
Resident at Rembang, M. Palm, who, on returning from Landak towards
Pontiana, shot one, and forwarded it to Batavia in spirit, for
transmission to Europe.

[footnote] *Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap.
Tweede Deel. Derde Druk. 1826.

Palm's letter describing the capture runs thus:--"Herewith I send your
Excellency, contrary to all expectation (since long ago I offered more
than a hundred ducats to the natives for an Orang-Utan of four or five
feet high) an Orang which I heard of this morning about eight o'clock.
For a long time we did our best to take the frightful beast alive in the
dense forest about half way to Landak. We forgot even to eat, so
anxious were we not to let him escape; but it was necessary to take
care that he did not revenge himself, as he kept continually breaking
off heavy pieces of wood and green branches, and dashing them at us.
This game lasted till four o'clock in the afternoon, when we determined
to shoot him; in which I succeeded very well, and indeed better than I
ever shot from a boat before; for the bullet went just into the side of
his chest, so that he was not much damaged. We got him into the prow
still living, and bound him fast, and next morning he died of his
wounds. All Pontiana came on board to see him when we arrived." Palm
gives his height from the head to the heel as 49 inches.

FIG. 7.--The Pongo Skull, sent by Radermacher to Camper, after Camper's
original sketches, as reproduced by Lucae.

A very intelligent German officer, Baron Von Wurmb, who at this time
held a post in the Dutch East India service, and was Secretary of the
Batavian Society, studied this animal, and his careful description of
it, entitled "Beschrijving van der Groote Borneosche Orang-outang of de
Oost-Indische Pongo," is contained in the same volume of the Batavian
Society's Transactions. After Von Wurmb had drawn up his description
he states, in a letter dated Batavia, Feb. 18, 1781,* that the specimen
was sent to Europe in brandy to be placed in the collection of the
Prince of Orange; "unfortunately," he continues, "we hear that the ship
has been wrecked." Von Wurmb died in the course of the year 1781, the
letter in which this passage occurs being the last he wrote; but in his
posthumous papers, published in the fourth part of the Transactions of
the Batavian Society, there is a brief description, with measurements,
of a female Pongo four feet high.

[footnote] "Briefe des Herrn v. Wurmb und des H. Baron von
Wollzogen. Gotha, 1794."

Did either of these original specimens, on which Von Wurmb's
descriptions are based, ever reach Europe? It is commonly supposed
that they did; but I doubt the fact. For, appended to the memoir 'De
l'Ourang-outang,' in the collected edition of Camper's works, tome i.,
pp. 64-66, is a note by Camper himself, referring to Von Wurmb's
papers, and continuing thus:--"Heretofore, this kind of ape had never
been known in Europe. Radermacher has had the kindness to send me the
skull of one of these animals, which measured fifty-three inches, or
four feet five inches, in height. I have sent some sketches of it to M.
Soemmering at Mayence, which are better calculated, however, to give an
idea of the form than of the real size of the parts."

These sketches have been reproduced by Fischer and by Lucae, and bear
date 1783, Soemmering having received them in 1784. Had either of Von
Wurmb's specimens reached Holland, they would hardly have been unknown
at this time to Camper, who, however, goes on to say--"It appears that
since this, some more of these monsters have been captured, for an
entire skeleton, very badly set up, which had been sent to the Museum of
the Prince of Orange, and which I saw only on the 27th of June, 1784,
was more than four feet high. I examined this skeleton again on the
19th December, 1785, after it had been excellently put to rights by the
ingenious Onymus."

It appears evident, then, that this skeleton, which is doubtless that
which has always gone by the name of Wurmb's Pongo, is not that of the
animal described by him, though unquestionably similar in all essential

Camper proceeds to note some of the most important features of this
skeleton; promises to describe it in detail by-and-bye; and is
evidently in doubt as to the relation of this great 'Pongo' to his
"petit Orang."

The promised further investigations were never carried out; and so it
happened that the Pongo of Von Wurmb took its place by the side of the
Chimpanzee, Gibbon, and Orang as a fourth and colossal species of
man-like Ape. And indeed nothing could look much less like the
Chimpanzees or the Orangs, then known, than the Pongo; for all the
specimens of Chimpanzee and Orang which had been observed were small of
stature, singularly human in aspect, gentle and docile; while Wurmb's
Pongo was a monster almost twice their size, of vast strength and
fierceness, and very brutal in expression; its great projecting muzzle,
armed with strong teeth, being further disfigured by the outgrowth of
the cheeks into fleshy lobes.

Eventually, in accordance with the usual marauding habits of the
Revolutionary armies, the 'Pongo' skeleton was carried away from
Holland into France, and notices of it, expressly intended to
demonstrate its entire distinctness from the Orang and its affinity with
the baboons, were given, in 1798, by Geoffroy St. Hilaire and Cuvier.

Even in Cuvier's 'Tableau Elementaire', and in the first edition of his
great work, the 'Regne Animal', the 'Pongo' is classed as a species of
Baboon. However, so early as 1818, it appears that Cuvier saw reason
to alter this opinion, and to adopt the view suggested several years
before by Blumenbach,* and after him by Tilesius, that the Bornean Pongo
is simply an adult Orang. In 1824, Rudolphi demonstrated, by the
condition of the dentition, more fully and completely than had been
done by his predecessors, that the Orangs described up to that time
were all young animals, and that the skull and teeth of the adult would
probably be such as those seen in the Pongo of Wurmb. In the second
edition of the 'Regne Animal' (1829), Cuvier infers, from the
'proportions of all the parts' and 'the arrangements of the foramina
and sutures of the head,' that the Pongo is the adult of the
Orang-Utan, 'at least of a very closely allied species,' and this
conclusion was eventually placed beyond all doubt by Professor Owen's
Memoir published in the 'Zoological Transactions' for 1835, and by
Temminck in his 'Monographies de Mammalogie'. Temminck's memoir is
remarkable for the completeness of the evidence which it affords as to
the modification which the form of the Orang undergoes according to age
and sex. Tiedemann first published an account of the brain of the
young Orang, while Sandifort, Muller and Schlegel, described the
muscles and the viscera of the adult, and gave the earliest detailed
and trustworthy history of the habits of the great Indian Ape in a
state of nature; and as important additions have been made by later
observers, we are at this moment better acquainted with the adult of
the Orang-Utan, than with that of any of the other greater man-like

[footnote] *See Blumenbach, 'Abbildungen Naturhistorichen
Gegenstande, No. 12, 1810; and Tilesius, Naturhistoriche
Fruchte der ersten Kaiserlich-Russischen Erdumsegelung', p.
115, 1813.

It is certainly the Pongo of Wurmb;* and it is as certainly not the
Pongo of Battell, seeing that the Orang-Utan is entirely confined to
the great Asiatic islands of Borneo and Sumatra.

[footnote] *Speaking broadly and without prejudice to the
question, whether there be more than one species of Orang.

And while the progress of discovery thus cleared up the history of the
Orang, it also became established that the only other man-like Apes in
the eastern world were the various species of Gibbon--Apes of smaller
stature, and therefore attracting less attention than the Orangs,
though they are spread over a much wider range of country, and are hence
more accessible to observation.

Although the geographical area inhabited by the 'Pongo' and Engeco of
Battell is so much nearer to Europe than that in which the Orang and
Gibbon are found, our acquaintance with the African Apes has been of
slower growth; indeed, it is only within the last few years that the
truthful story of the old English adventurer has been rendered fully
intelligible. It was not until 1835 that the skeleton of the adult
Chimpanzee became known, by the publication of Professor Owen's
above-mentioned very excellent memoir 'On the osteology of the
Chimpanzee and Orang', in the 'Zoological Transactions'--a memoir which,
by the accuracy of its descriptions, the carefulness of its
comparisons, and the excellence of its figures, made an epoch in the
history of our knowledge of the bony framework, not only of the
Chimpanzee, but of all the anthropoid Apes.

By the investigations herein detailed, it became evident that the old
Chimpanzee acquired a size and aspect as different from those of the
young known to Tyson, to Buffon, and to Traill, as those of the old
Orang from the young Orang; and the subsequent very important
researches of Messrs. Savage and Wyman, the American missionary and
anatomist, have not only confirmed this conclusion, but have added many
new details.*

[footnote] *See "Observations on the external characters and
habits of the Troglodytes niger, by Thomas N. Savage, M.D.,
and on its organization by Jeffries Wyman, M.D.," 'Boston
Journal of Natural History', vol. iv., 1843-4; and
"External characters, habits, and osteology of Troglodytes
Gorilla," by the same authors, 'ibid'., vol. v., 1847.

One of the most interesting among the many valuable discoveries made by
Dr. Thomas Savage is the fact, that the natives in the Gaboon country
at the present day, apply to the Chimpanzee a name--"Enche-eko"--which
is obviously identical with the "Engeko" of Battell; a discovery which
has been confirmed by all later inquirers. Battell's "lesser monster"
being thus proved to be a veritable existence, of course a strong
presumption arose that his "greater monster," the 'Pongo,' would sooner
or later be discovered. And, indeed, a modern traveller, Bowdich, had,
in 1819, found strong evidence, among the natives, of the existence of a
second great Ape, called the 'Ingena,' "five feet high, and four across
the shoulders," the builder of a rude house, on the outside of which it

In 1847, Dr. Savage had the good fortune to make another and most
important addition to our knowledge of the man-like Apes; for, being
unexpectedly detained at the Gaboon river, he saw in the house of the
Rev. Mr. Wilson, a missionary resident there, "a skull represented by
the natives to be a monkey-like animal, remarkable for its size,
ferocity, and habits." From the contour of the skull, and the
information derived from several intelligent natives, "I was induced,"
says Dr. Savage (using the term Orang in its old general sense) "to
believe that it belonged to a new species of Orang. I expressed this
opinion to Mr. Wilson, with a desire for further investigation; and, if
possible, to decide the point by the inspection of a specimen alive or
dead." The result of the combined exertions of Messrs. Savage and
Wilson was not only the obtaining of a very full account of the habits
of this new creature, but a still more important service to science,
the enabling the excellent American anatomist already mentioned,
Professor Wyman, to describe, from ample materials, the distinctive
osteological characters of the new form. This animal was called by the
natives of the Gaboon "Enge-ena," a name obviously identical with the
"Ingena" of Bowdich; and Dr. Savage arrived at the conviction that this
last discovered of all the great Apes was the long-sought "Pongo" of

The justice of this conclusion, indeed, is beyond doubt--for not only
does the 'Enge-ena' agree with Battell's "greater monster" in its
hollow eyes, its great stature, and its dun or iron-grey colour, but
the only other man-like Ape which inhabits these latitudes--the
Chimpanzee--is at once identified, by its smaller size, as the "lesser
monster," and is excluded from any possibility of being the 'Pongo,' by
the fact that it is black and not dun, to say nothing of the important
circumstance already mentioned that it still retains the name of
'Engeko,' or "Enche-eko," by which Battell knew it.

In seeking for a specific name for the "Enge-ena," however, Dr. Savage
wisely avoided the much misused 'Pongo'; but finding in the ancient
Periplus of Hanno the word "Gorilla" applied to certain hairy savage
people, discovered by the Carthaginian voyager in an island on the
African coast, he attached the specific name "Gorilla" to his new ape,
whence arises its present well-known appellation. But Dr. Savage, more
cautious than some of his successors, by no means identifies his ape
with Hanno's "wild men." He merely says that the latter were "probably
one of the species of the Orang;" and I quite agree with M. Brulle, that
there is no ground for identifying the modern 'Gorilla' with that of
the Carthaginian admiral.

Since the memoir of Savage and Wyman was published, the skeleton of the
Gorilla has been investigated by Professor Owen and by the late
Professor Duvernoy, of the Jardin des Plantes, the latter having
further supplied a valuable account of the muscular system and of many
of the other soft parts; while African missionaries and travellers have
confirmed and expanded the account originally given of the habits of
this great man-like Ape, which has had the singular fortune of being
the first to be made known to the general world and the last to be
scientifically investigated.

Two centuries and a half have passed away since Battell told his stories
about the 'greater' and the 'lesser monsters' to Purchas, and it has
taken nearly that time to arrive at the clear result that there are
four distinct kinds of Anthropoids--in Eastern Asia, the Gibbons and the
Orangs; in Western Africa, the Chimpanzees and the Gorilla.

The man-like Apes, the history of whose discovery has just been
detailed, have certain characters of structure and of distribution in
common. Thus they all have the same number of teeth as man--possessing
four incisors, two canines, four false molars, and six true molars in
each jaw, or 32 teeth in all, in the adult condition; while the milk
dentition consists of 20 teeth--or four incisors, two canines, and four
molars in each jaw. They are what are called catarrhine Apes--that is,
their nostrils have a narrow partition and look downwards; and,
furthermore, their arms are always longer than their legs, the
difference being sometimes greater and sometimes less; so that if the
four were arranged in the order of the length of their arms in
proportion to that of their legs, we should have this series--Orang (1
4/9:1), Gibbon (1 1/4:1), Gorilla (1 1/5:1), Chimpanzee (1 1/16:1). In
all, the fore limbs are terminated by hands, provided with longer or
shorter thumbs; while the great toe of the foot, always smaller than in
Man, is far more movable than in him and can be opposed, like a thumb,
to the rest of the foot. None of these apes have tails, and none of
them possess the cheek pouches common among monkeys. Finally, they are
all inhabitants of the old world.

The Gibbons are the smallest, slenderest, and longest-limbed of the
man-like apes: their arms are longer in proportion to their bodies than
those of any of the other man-like Apes, so that they can touch the
ground when erect; their hands are longer than their feet, and they are
the only Anthropoids which possess callosities like the lower monkeys.
They are variously coloured. The Orangs have arms which reach to the
ankles in the erect position of the animal; their thumbs and great toes
are very short, and their feet are longer than their hands. They are
covered with reddish brown hair, and the sides of the face, in adult
males, are commonly produced into two crescentic, flexible
excrescences, like fatty tumours. The Chimpanzees have arms which
reach below the knees; they have large thumbs and great toes, their
hands are longer than their feet; and their hair is black, while the
skin of the face is pale. The Gorilla, lastly, has arms which reach to
the middle of the leg, large thumbs and great toes, feet longer than
the hands, a black face, and dark-grey or dun hair.

For the purpose which I have at present in view, it is unnecessary that
I should enter into any further minutiae respecting the distinctive
characters of the genera and species into which these man-like Apes are
divided by naturalists. Suffice it to say, that the Orangs and the
Gibbons constitute the distinct genera, 'Simia' and 'Hylobates'; while
the Chimpanzees and Gorillas are by some regarded simply as distinct
species of one genus, 'Troglodytes'; by others as distinct
genera--'Troglodytes' being reserved for the Chimpanzees, and 'Gorilla'
for the Enge-ena or Pongo.

Sound knowledge respecting the habits and mode of life of the man-like
Apes has been even more difficult of attainment than correct
information regarding their structure.

Once in a generation, a Wallace may be found physically, mentally, and
morally qualified to wander unscathed through the tropical wilds of
America and of Asia; to form magnificent collections as he wanders; and
withal to think out sagaciously the conclusions suggested by his
collections: but, to the ordinary explorer or collector, the dense
forests of equatorial Asia and Africa, which constitute the favourite
habitation of the Orang, the Chimpanzee, and the Gorilla, present
difficulties of no ordinary magnitude: and the man who risks his life by
even a short visit to the malarious shores of those regions may well be
excused if he shrinks from facing the dangers of the interior; if he
contents himself with stimulating the industry of the better seasoned
natives, and collecting and collating the more or less mythical reports
and traditions with which they are too ready to supply him.

In such a manner most of the earlier accounts of the habits of the
man-like Apes originated; and even now a good deal of what passes
current must be admitted to have no very safe foundation. The best
information we possess is that, based almost wholly on direct European
testimony respecting the Gibbons; the next best evidence relates to the
Orangs; while our knowledge of the habits of the Chimpanzee and the
Gorilla stands much in need of support and enlargement by additional
testimony from instructed European eye-witnesses.

It will therefore be convenient in endeavouring to form a notion of what
we are justified in believing about these animals, to commence with the
best known man-like Apes, the Gibbons and Orangs; and to make use of
the perfectly reliable information respecting them as a sort of
criterion of the probable truth or falsehood of assertions respecting
the others.

Of the GIBBONS, half a dozen species are found scattered over the
Asiatic islands, Java, Sumatra, Borneo, and through Malacca, Siam,
Arracan, and an uncertain extent of Hindostan, on the main land of
Asia. The largest attain a few inches above three feet in height, from
the crown to the heel, so that they are shorter than the other man-like
Apes; while the slenderness of their bodies renders their mass far
smaller in proportion even to this diminished height.

Dr. Salomon Muller, an accomplished Dutch naturalist, who lived for many
years in the Eastern Archipelago, and to the results of whose personal
experience I shall frequently have occasion to refer, states that the
Gibbons are true mountaineers, loving the slopes and edges of the
hills, though they rarely ascend beyond the limit of the fig-trees. All
day long they haunt the tops of the tall trees; and though, towards
evening, they descend in small troops to the open ground, no sooner do
they spy a man than they dart up the hill-sides, and disappear in the
darker valleys.

All observers testify to the prodigious volume of voice possessed by
these animals. According to the writer whom I have just cited, in one
of them, the Siamang, "the voice is grave and penetrating, resembling
the sounds goek, goek, goek, goek, goek ha ha ha ha haaaaa, and may
easily be heard at a distance of half a league." While the cry is being
uttered, the great membranous bag under the throat which communicates
with the organ of voice, the so-called "laryngeal sac," becomes greatly
distended, diminishing again when the creature relapses into silence.

M. Duvaucel, likewise, affirms that the cry of the Siamang may be heard
for miles--making the woods ring again. So Mr. Martin* describes the
cry of the agile Gibbon as "overpowering and deafening" in a room, and
"from its strength, well calculated for resounding through the vast
forests." Mr. Waterhouse, an accomplished musician as well as
zoologist, says, "The Gibbon's voice is certainly much more powerful
than that of any singer I have ever heard." And yet it is to be
recollected that this animal is not half the height of, and far less
bulky in proportion than, a man.

[footnote] *'Man and Monkies', p. 423.

There is good testimony that various species of Gibbon readily take to
the erect posture. Mr. George Bennett,* a very excellent observer, in
describing the habits of a male 'Hylobates syndactylus' which remained
for some time in his possession, says: "He invariably walks in the
erect posture when on a level surface; and then the arms either hang
down, enabling him to assist himself with his knuckles; or what is more
usual, he keeps his arms uplifted in nearly an erect position, with the
hands pendent ready to seize a rope, and climb up on the approach of
danger or on the obtrusion of strangers. He walks rather quick in the
erect posture, but with a waddling gait, and is soon run down if,
whilst pursued, he has no opportunity of escaping by climbing.... When
he walks in the erect posture he turns the leg and foot outwards, which
occasions him to have a waddling gait and to seem bow-legged."

{footnote] *'Wanderings in New South Wales', vol. ii. chap. viii.,

Dr. Burrough states of another Gibbon, the Horlack or Hooluk: "They
walk erect; and when placed on the floor, or in an open field, balance
themselves very prettily, by raising their hands over their head and
slightly bending the arm at the wrist and elbow, and then run tolerably
fast, rocking from side to side; and, if urged to greater speed, they
let fall their hands to the ground, and assist themselves forward,
rather jumping than running, still keeping the body, however, nearly

Somewhat different evidence, however, is given by Dr. Winslow Lewis:*

"Their only manner of walking was on their posterior or inferior
extremities, the others being raised upwards to preserve their
equilibrium, as rope-dancers are assisted by long poles at fairs. Their
progression was not by placing one foot before the other, but by
simultaneously using both, as in jumping." Dr. Salomon Muller also
states that the Gibbons progress along the ground by a short series of
tottering jumps, effected only by the hind limbs, the body being held
altogether upright.

[footnote] *'Boston Journal of Natural History', vol. i., 1834.

But Mr. Martin (l. c. p. 418), who also speaks from direct observation,
says of the Gibbons generally:

"Pre-eminently qualified for arboreal habits, and displaying among the
branches amazing activity, the Gibbons are not so awkward or
embarrassed on a level surface as might be imagined. They walk erect,
with a waddling or unsteady gait, but at a quick pace; the equilibrium
of the body requiring to be kept up, either by touching the ground with
the knuckles, first on one side then on the other, or by uplifting the
arms so as to poise it. As with the Chimpanzee, the whole of the
narrow, long sole of the foot is placed upon the ground at once and
raised at once, without any elasticity of step."

FIG. 8.--Gibbon ('H. pileatus'), after Wolf.

After this mass of concurrent and independent testimony, it cannot
reasonably be doubted that the Gibbons commonly and habitually assume
the erect attitude.

But level ground is not the place where these animals can display their
very remarkable and peculiar locomotive powers, and that prodigious
activity which almost tempts one to rank them among flying, rather than
among ordinary climbing mammals.

Mr. Martin (l.c. p. 430) has given so excellent and graphic an account
of the movements of a 'Hylobates agilis', living in the Zoological
Gardens, in 1840, that I will quote it in full:

"It is almost impossible to convey in words an idea of the quickness and
graceful address of her movements: they may indeed be termed aerial, as
she seems merely to touch in her progress the branches among which she
exhibits her evolutions. In these feats her hands and arms are the
sole organs of locomotion; her body hanging as if suspended by a rope,
sustained by one hand (the right for example) she launches herself, by
an energetic movement, to a distant branch, which she catches with the
left hand; but her hold is less than momentary: the impulse for the
next launch is acquired: the branch then aimed at is attained by the
right hand again, and quitted instantaneously, and so on, in alternate
succession. In this manner spaces of twelve and eighteen feet are
cleared, with the greatest ease and uninterruptedly, for hours
together, without the slightest appearance of fatigue being manifested;
and it is evident that, if more space could be allowed, distances very
greatly exceeding eighteen feet would be as easily cleared; so that
Duvaucel's assertion that he has seen these animals launch themselves
from one branch to another, forty feet asunder, startling as it is, may
be well credited. Sometimes, on seizing a branch in her progress, she
will throw herself, by the power of one arm only, completely round it,
making a revolution with such rapidity as almost to deceive the eye,
and continue her progress with undiminished velocity. It is singular
to observe how suddenly this Gibbon can stop, when the impetus given by
the rapidity and distance of her swinging leaps would seem to require a
gradual abatement of her movements. In the very midst of her flight a
branch is seized, the body raised, and she is seen, as if by magic,
quietly seated on it, grasping it with her feet. As suddenly she again
throws herself into action.

"The following facts will convey some notion of her dexterity and
quickness. A live bird was let loose in her apartment; she marked its
flight, made a long swing to a distant branch, caught the bird with one
hand in her passage, and attained the branch with her other hand; her
aim, both at the bird and at the branch, being as successful as if one
object only had engaged her attention. It may be added that she
instantly bit off the head of the bird, picked its feathers, and then
threw it down without attempting to eat it.

"On another occasion this animal swung herself from a perch, across a
passage at least twelve feet wide, against a window which it was
thought would be immediately broken: but not so; to the surprise of
all, she caught the narrow framework between the panes with her hand, in
an instant attained the proper impetus, and sprang back again to the
cage she had left--a feat requiring not only great strength, but the
nicest precision."

The Gibbons appear to be naturally very gentle, but there is very good
evidence that they will bite severely when irritated--a female
'Hylobates agilis' having so severely lacerated one man with her long
canines, that he died; while she had injured others so much that, by way
of precaution, these formidable teeth had been filed down; but, if
threatened, she would still turn on her keeper. The Gibbons eat
insects, but appear generally to avoid animal food. A Siamang,
however, was seen by Mr. Bennett to seize and devour greedily a live
lizard. They commonly drink by dipping their fingers in the liquid and
then licking them. It is asserted that they sleep in a sitting

Duvaucel affirms that he has seen the females carry their young to the
waterside and there wash their faces, in spite of resistance and
cries. They are gentle and affectionate in captivity--full of tricks
and pettishness, like spoiled children, and yet not devoid of a certain
conscience, as an anecdote, told by Mr. Bennett (l. c. p. 156), will
show. It would appear that his Gibbon had a peculiar inclination for
disarranging things in the cabin. Among these articles, a piece of
soap would especially attract his notice, and for the removal of this he
had been once or twice scolded. "One morning," says Mr. Bennett, "I
was writing, the ape being present in the cabin, when casting my eyes
towards him, I saw the little fellow taking the soap. I watched him
without his perceiving that I did so: and he occasionally would cast a
furtive glance towards the place where I sat. I pretended to write;
he, seeing me busily occupied, took the soap, and moved away with it in
his paw. When he had walked half the length of the cabin, I spoke
quietly, without frightening him. The instant he found I saw him, he
walked back again, and deposited the soap nearly in the same place from
whence he had taken it. There was certainly something more than
instinct in that action: he evidently betrayed a consciousness of
having done wrong both by his first and last actions--and what is reason
if that is not an exercise of it?"

The most elaborate account of the natural history of the ORANG-UTAN
extant, is that given in the "Verhandelingen over de Natuurlijke
Geschiedenis der Nederlandsche overzeesche Bezittingen (1839-45)," by
Dr. Salomon Muller and Dr. Schlegel, and I shall base what I have to
say, upon this subject almost entirely on their statements, adding, here
and there, particulars of interest from the writings of Brooke,
Wallace, and others.

The Orang-Utan would rarely seem to exceed four feet in height, but the
body is very bulky, measuring two-thirds of the height in

[footnote] *The largest Orang-Utan, cited by Temminck,
measured, when standing upright, 4 ft.; but he mentions
having just received news of the capture of an Orang 5 ft.
3 in. high. Schlegel and Juller say that their largest old
male measured, upright, 1.25 Netherlands "el"; and from the
crown to the end of the toes, 1.5 el; the circumference of
the body being about 1 el. The largest old female was 1.09
el high, when standing. The adult skeleton in the College
of Surgeons' Museum, if set upright, would stand 3 ft. 6-8
in. from crown to sole. Dr. Humphry gives 3 ft. 8 in. as
the mean height of two Orangs. Of seventeen Orangs
examined by Mr. Wallace, the largest was 4 ft. 2 in. high,
from the heel to the crown of the head. Mr. Spencer St.
John, however, in his 'Life in the Forests of the Far
East', tells us of an Orang of "5 ft. 2 in., measuring
fairly from the head to the heel," 15 in. across the face,
and 12 in. round the wrist. It does not appear, however,
that Mr. St. John measured this Orang himself.

The Orang-Utan is found only in Sumatra and Borneo, and is common in
neither of these islands--in both of which it occurs always in low,
flat plains, never in the mountains. It loves the densest and most
sombre of the forests, which extend from the sea-shore inland, and thus
is found only in the eastern half of Sumatra, where alone such forests
occur, though, occasionally, it strays over to the western side.

On the other hand, it is generally distributed through Borneo, except in
the mountains, or where the population is dense. In favourable places,
the hunter may, by good fortune, see three or four in a day.

FIG. 9.-An adult male Orang-utan, after Muller and Schlegel.

Except in the pairing time, the old males usually live by themselves.
The old females, and the immature males, on the other hand, are often
met with in twos and threes; and the former occasionally have young
with them, though the pregnant females usually separate themselves, and
sometimes remain apart after they have given birth to their offspring.
The young Orangs seem to remain unusually long under their mother's
protection, probably in consequence of their slow growth. While
climbing, the mother always carries her young against her bosom, the
young holding on by his mother's hair.* At what time of life the
Orang-Utan becomes capable of propagation, and how long the females go
with young, is unknown, but it is probable that they are not adult
until they arrive at ten or fifteen years of age. A female which lived
for five years at Batavia, had not attained one-third the height of the
wild females. It is probable that, after reaching adult years, they go
on growing, though slowly, and that they live to forty or fifty years.
The Dyaks tell of old Orangs, which have not only lost all their teeth,
but which find it so troublesome to climb, that they maintain themselves
on windfalls and juicy herbage.

[footnote] *See Mr. Wallace's account of an infant
"Orang-utan," in the 'Annals of Natural History' for 1856.
Mr. Wallace provided his interesting charge with an
artificial mother of buffalo-skin, but the cheat was too
successful. The infant's entire experience led it to
associate teats with hair, and feeling the latter, it spent
its existence in vain endeavours to discover the former.

The Orang is sluggish, exhibiting none of that marvellous activity
characteristic of the Gibbons. Hunger alone seems to stir him to
exertion, and when it is stilled, he relapses into repose. When the
animal sits, it curves its back and bows its head, so as to look
straight down on the ground; sometimes it holds on with its hands by a
higher branch, sometimes lets them hang phlegmatically down by its
side--and in these positions the Orang will remain, for hours together,
in the same spot, almost without stirring, and only now and then giving
utterance to its deep, growling voice. By day, he usually climbs from
one tree-top to another, and only at night descends to the ground, and
if then threatened with danger, he seeks refuge among the underwood.
When not hunted, he remains a long time in the same locality, and
sometimes stops for many days on the same tree--a firm place among its
branches serving him for a bed. It is rare for the Orang to pass the
night in the summit of a large tree, probably because it is too windy
and cold there for him; but, as soon as night draws on, he descends from
the height and seeks out a fit bed in the lower and darker part, or in
the leafy top of a small tree, among which he prefers Nibong Palms,
Pandani, or one of those parasitic Orchids which give the primeval
forests of Borneo so characteristic and striking an appearance. But
wherever he determines to sleep, there he prepares himself a sort of
nest: little boughs and leaves are drawn together round the selected
spot, and bent crosswise over one another; while to make the bed soft,
great leaves of Ferns, of Orchids, of 'Pandanus fascicularis', 'Nipa
fruticans', etc., are laid over them. Those which Muller saw, many of
them being very fresh, were situated at a height of ten to twenty-five
feet above the ground, and had a circumference, on the average, of two
or three feet. Some were packed many inches thick with 'Pandanus'
leaves; others were remarkable only for the cracked twigs, which,
united in a common centre, formed a regular platform. "The rude
'hut'," says Sir James Brooke, "which they are stated to build in the
trees, would be more properly called a seat or nest, for it has no roof
or cover of any sort. The facility with which they form this nest is
curious, and I had an opportunity of seeing a wounded female weave the
branches together and seat herself, within a minute."

According to the Dyaks the Orang rarely leaves his bed before the sun is
well above the horizon and has dissipated the mists. He gets up about
nine, and goes to bed again about five; but sometimes not till late in
the twilight. He lies sometimes on his back; or, by way of change,
turns on one side or the other, drawing his limbs up to his body, and
resting his head on his hand. When the night is cold, windy, or rainy,
he usually covers his body with a heap of 'Pandanus', 'Nipa', or Fern
leaves, like those of which his bed is made, and he is especially
careful to wrap up his head in them. It is this habit of covering
himself up which has probably led to the fable that the Orang builds
huts in the trees.

Although the Orang resides mostly amid the boughs of great trees, during
the daytime, he is very rarely seen squatting on a thick branch, as
other apes, and particularly the Gibbons, do. The Orang, on the
contrary, confines himself to the slender leafy branches, so that he is
seen right at the top of the trees, a mode of life which is closely
related to the constitution of his hinder limbs, and especially to that
of his seat. For this is provided with no callosities, such as are
possessed by many of the lower apes, and even by the Gibbons; and those
bones of the pelvis, which are termed the ischia, and which form the
solid framework of the surface on which the body rests in the sitting
posture, are not expanded like those of the apes which possess
callosities, but are more like those of man.

An Orang climbs so slowly and cautiously,* as, in this act, to resemble
a man more than an ape, taking great care of his feet, so that injury
of them seems to affect him far more than it does other apes. Unlike
the Gibbons, whose forearms do the greater part of the work, as they
swing from branch to branch, the Orang never makes even the smallest
jump. In climbing, he moves alternately one hand and one foot, or,
after having laid fast hold with the hands, he draws up both feet
together. In passing from one tree to another, he always seeks out a
place where the twigs of both come close together, or interlace. Even
when closely pursued, his circumspection is amazing: he shakes the
branches to see if they will bear him, and then bending an overhanging
bough down by throwing his weight gradually along it, he makes a bridge
from the tree he wishes to quit to the next.**

[footnote] * "They are the slowest and least active of all
the monkey tribe, and their motions are surprisingly
awkward and uncouth."--Sir James Brooke, in the
'Proceedings of the Zoological Society', 1841.

[footnote] **Mr. Wallace's account of the progression of the
Orang almost exactly corresponds with this.

On the ground the Orang always goes laboriously and shakily, on all
fours. At starting he will run faster than a man, though he may soon
be overtaken. The very long arms which, when he runs, are but little
bent, raise the body of the Orang remarkably, so that he assumes much
the posture of a very old man bent down by age, and making his way
along by the help of a stick. In walking, the body is usually directed
straight forward, unlike the other apes, which run more or less
obliquely; except the Gibbons, who in these, as in so many other
respects, depart remarkably from their fellows.

The Orang cannot put its feet flat on the ground, but is supported upon
their outer edges, the heel resting more on the ground, while the
curved toes partly rest upon the ground by the upper side of their
first joint, the two outermost toes of each foot completely resting on
this surface. The hands are held in the opposite manner, their inner
edges serving as the chief support. The fingers are then bent out in
such a manner that their foremost joints, especially those of the two
innermost fingers, rest upon the ground by their upper sides, while the
point of the free and straight thumb serves as an additional fulcrum.

The Orang never stands on its hind legs, and all the pictures,
representing it as so doing, are as false as the assertion that it
defends itself with sticks, and the like.

The long arms are of especial use, not only in climbing, but in the
gathering of food from boughs to which the animal could not trust his
weight. Figs, blossoms, and young leaves of various kinds, constitute
the chief nutriment of the Orang; but strips of bamboo two or three
feet long were found in the stomach of a male. They are not known to
eat living animals.

Although, when taken young, the Orang-Utan soon becomes domesticated,
and indeed seems to court human society, it is naturally a very wild
and shy animal, though apparently sluggish and melancholy. The Dyaks
affirm, that when the old males are wounded with arrows only, they will
occasionally leave the trees and rush raging upon their enemies, whose
sole safety lies in instant flight, as they are sure to be killed if

[footnote] *Sir James Brooke, in a letter to Mr. Waterhouse,
published in the proceedings of the Zoological Society for
1841, says:--"On the habits of the Orangs, as far as I have
been able to observe them, I may remark that they are as
dull and slothful as can well be conceived, and on no
occasion, when pursuing them, did they move so fast as to
preclude my keeping pace with them easily through a
moderately clear forest; and even when obstructions below
(such as wading up to the neck) allowed them to get away
some distance, they were sure to stop and allow me to come
up. I never observed the slightest attempt at defence, and
the wood which sometimes rattled about our ears was broken
by their weight, and not thrown, as some persons
represent. If pushed to extremity, however, the 'Pappan'
could not be otherwise than formidable, and one unfortunate
man, who, with a party, was trying to catch a large one
alive, lost two of his fingers, besides being severely
bitten on the face, whilst the animal finally beat off his
pursuers and escaped." Mr. Wallace, on the other hand,
affirms that he has several times observed them throwing
down branches when pursued. "It is true he does not throw
them 'at' a person, but casts them down vertically; for it
is evident that a bough cannot be thrown to any distance
from the top of a lofty tree. In one case a female Mias,
on a durian tree, kept up for at least ten minutes a
continuous shower of branches and of the heavy, spined
fruits, as large as 32-pounders, which most effectually kept
us clear of the tree she was on. She could be seen
breaking them off and throwing them down with every
appearance of rage, uttering at intervals a loud pumping
grunt, and evidently meaning mischief."--"On the Habits of
the Orang-Utan," 'Annals of Nat. History, 1856. This
statement, it will be observed, is quite in accordance with
that contained in the letter of the Resident Palm quoted
above (p. 210).

But, though possessed of immense strength, it is rare for the Orang to
attempt to defend itself, especially when attacked with fire-arms. On
such occasions he endeavours to hide himself, or to escape along the
topmost branches of the trees, breaking off and throwing down the
boughs as he goes. When wounded he betakes himself to the highest
attainable point of the tree, and emits a singular cry, consisting at
first of high notes, which at length deepen into a low roar, not unlike
that of a panther. While giving out the high notes the Orang thrusts
out his lips into a funnel shape; but in uttering the low notes he
holds his mouth wide open, and at the same time the great throat bag,
or laryngeal sac, becomes distended.

According to the Dyaks, the only animal the Orang measures his strength
with is the crocodile, who occasionally seizes him on his visits to the
water side. But they say that the Orang is more than a match for his
enemy, and beats him to death, or rips up his throat by pulling the
jaws asunder!

Much of what has been here stated was probably derived by Dr. Muller
from the reports of his Dyak hunters; but a large male, four feet high,
lived in captivity, under his observation, for a month, and receives a
very bad character.

"He was a very wild beast," says Muller, "of prodigious strength, and
false and wicked to the last degree. If any one approached he rose up
slowly with a low growl, fixed his eyes in the direction in which he
meant to make his attack, slowly passed his hand between the bars of
his cage, and then extending his long arm, gave a sudden grip--usually
at the face." He never tried to bite (though Orangs will bite one
another), his great weapons of offence and defence being his hands.

His intelligence was very great; and Muller remarks, that though the
faculties of the Orang have been estimated too highly, yet Cuvier, had
he seen this specimen, would not have considered its intelligence to be
only a little higher than that of the dog.

His hearing was very acute, but the sense of vision seemed to be less
perfect. The under lip was the great organ of touch, and played a very
important part in drinking, being thrust out like a trough, so as
either to catch the falling rain, or to receive the contents of the
half cocoa-nut shell full of water with which the Orang was supplied,
and which, in drinking, he poured into the trough thus formed.

In Borneo the Orang-Utan of the Malays goes by the name of "Mias" among
the Dyaks, who distinguish several kinds as 'Mias Pappan', or 'Zimo',
'Mias Kassu', and 'Mias Rambi'. Whether these are distinct species,
however, or whether they are mere races, and how far any of them are
identical with the Sumatran Orang, as Mr. Wallace thinks the Mias Pappan
to be, are problems which are at present undecided; and the variability
of these great apes is so extensive, that the settlement of the
question is a matter of great difficulty. Of the form called "Mias
Pappan," Mr. Wallace* observes, "It is known by its large size, and by
the lateral expansion of the face into fatty protuberances, or ridges,
over the temporal muscles, which has been mis-termed 'callosities', as
they are perfectly soft, smooth, and flexible. Five of this form,
measured by me, varied only from 4 feet 1 inch to 4 feet 2 inches in
height, from the heel to the crown of the head, the girth of the body
from 3 feet to 3 feet 7 1/2 inches, and the extent of the outstretched
arms from 7 feet 2 inches to 7 feet 6 inches; the width of the face from
10 to 13 1/4 inches. The colour and length of the hair varied in
different individuals, and in different parts of the same individual;
some possessed a rudimentary nail on the great toe, others none at all;
but they otherwise present no external differences on which to
establish even varieties of a species.

[footnote] *On the Orang-Utan, or Mias of Borneo, 'Annals of
Natural History', 1856.

"Yet, when we examine the crania of these individuals, we find
remarkable differences of form, proportion, and dimension, no two being
exactly alike. The slope of the profile, and the projection of the
muzzle, together with the size of the cranium, offer differences as
decided as those existing between the most strongly marked forms of the
Caucasian and African crania in the human species. The orbits vary in
width and height, the cranial ridge is either single or double, either
much or little developed, and the zygomatic aperture varies considerably
in size. This variation in the proportions of the crania enables us
satisfactorily to explain the marked difference presented by the
single-crested and double-crested skulls, which have been thought to
prove the existence of two large species of Orang. The external surface
of the skull varies considerably in size, as do also the zygomatic
aperture and the temporal muscle; but they bear no necessary relation
to each other, a small muscle often existing with a large cranial
surface, and 'vice versa'. Now, those skulls which have the largest
and strongest jaws and the widest zygomatic aperture, have the muscles
so large that they meet on the crown of the skull, and deposit the bony
ridge which supports them, and which is the highest in that which has
the smallest cranial surface. In those which combine a large surface
with comparatively weak jaws, and small zygomatic aperture, the
muscles, on each side, do not extend to the crown, a space of from l to
2 inches remaining between them, and along their margins small ridges
are formed. Intermediate forms are found, in which the ridges meet
only in the hinder part of the skull. The form and size of the ridges
are therefore independent of age, being sometimes more strongly
developed in the less aged animal. Professor Temminck states that the
series of skulls in the Leyden Museum shows the same result."

Mr. Wallace observed two male adult Orangs (Mias Kassu of the Dyaks),
however, so very different from any of these that he concludes them to
be specifically distinct; they were respectively 3 feet 8 1/2 inches
and 3 feet 9 1/2 inches high, and possessed no sign of the cheek
excrescences, but otherwise resembled the larger kinds. The skull has
no crest, but two bony ridges, 1 3/4 inches to 2 inches apart, as in
the 'Simia morio' of Professor Owen. The teeth, however; are immense,
equalling or surpassing those of the other species. The females of
both these kinds, according to Mr. Wallace, are devoid of excrescences,
and resemble the smaller males, but are shorter by 1 1/2 to 3 inches,
and their canine teeth are comparatively small, subtruncated and
dilated at the base, as in the so-called 'Simia morio', which is, in
all probability, the skull of a female of the same species as the
smaller males. Both males and females of this smaller species are
distinguishable, according to Mr. Wallace, by the comparatively large
size of the middle incisors of the upper jaw.

So far as I am aware, no one has attempted to dispute the accuracy of
the statements which I have just quoted regarding the habits of the two
Asiatic man-like Apes; and if true, they must be admitted as evidence,
that such an Ape--

Firstly, May readily move along the ground in the erect, or
semi-erect, position, and without direct support from its arms.

Secondly, That it may possess an extremely loud voice, so loud as to
be readily heard one or two miles.

Thirdly, That it may be capable of great viciousness and violence
when irritated: and this is especially true of adult males.

Fourthly, That it may build a nest to sleep in.

Such being well established facts respecting the Asiatic Anthropoids,
analogy alone might justify us in expecting the African species to
offer similar peculiarities, separately or combined; or, at any rate,
would destroy the force of any attempted 'a priori' argument against
such direct testimony as might be adduced in favour of their
existence. And, if the organization of any of the African Apes could
be demonstrated to fit it better than either of its Asiatic allies for
the erect position and for efficient attack, there would be still less
reason for doubting its occasional adoption of the upright attitude or
of aggressive proceedings.

From the time of Tyson and Tulpius downwards, the habits of the young
CHIMPANZEE in a state of captivity have been abundantly reported and
commented upon. But trustworthy evidence as to the manners and customs
of adult anthropoids of this species, in their native woods, was almost
wanting up to the time of the publication of the paper by Dr. Savage,
to which I have already referred; containing notes of the observations
which he made, and of the information which he collected from sources
which he considered trustworthy, while resident at Cape Palmas, at the
north-western limit of the Bight of Benin.

The adult Chimpanzees measured by Dr. Savage, never exceeded, though the
males may almost attain, five feet in height.

"When at rest, the sitting posture is that generally assumed. They are
sometimes seen standing and walking, but when thus detected, they
immediately take to all fours, and flee from the presence of the
observer. Such is their organization that they cannot stand erect, but
lean forward. Hence they are seen, when standing, with the hands
clasped over the occiput, or the lumbar region, which would seem
necessary to balance or ease of posture.

"The toes of the adult are strongly flexed and turned inwards, and
cannot be perfectly straightened. In the attempt the skin gathers into
thick folds on the back, shewing that the full expansion of the foot,
as is necessary in walking, is unnatural. The natural position is on
all fours, the body anteriorly resting upon the knuckles. These are
greatly enlarged, with the skin protuberant and thickened like the sole
of the foot.

"They are expert climbers, as one would suppose from their organization.
In their gambols they swing from limb to limb to a great distance, and
leap with astonishing agility. It is not unusual to see the 'old
folks' (in the language of an observer) sitting under a tree regaling
themselves with fruit and friendly chat, while their 'children' are
leaping around them, and swinging from tree to tree with boisterous

"As seen here, they cannot be called 'gregarious', seldom more than
five, or ten at most, being found together. It has been said, on good
authority, that they occasionally assemble in large numbers, in
gambols. My informant asserts that he saw once not less than fifty so
engaged; hooting, screaming, and drumming with sticks upon old logs,
which is done in the latter case with equal facility by the four
extremities. They do not appear ever to act on the offensive, and
seldom, if ever really, on the defensive. When about to be captured,
they resist by throwing their arms about their opponent, and attempting
to draw him into contact with their teeth." (Savage, l. c. p. 384.)

With respect to this last point Dr. Savage is very explicit in another
place: "Biting" is their principal art of defence. I have seen one
man who had been thus severely wounded in the feet.

"The strong development of the canine teeth in the adult would seem to
indicate a carnivorous propensity; but in no state save that of
domestication do they manifest it. At first they reject flesh, but
easily acquire a fondness for it. The canines are early developed, and
evidently designed to act the important part of weapons of defence.
When in contact with man almost the first effort of the animal is--'to

"They avoid the abodes of men, and build their habitations in trees.
Their construction is more that of 'nests' than 'huts', as they have
been erroneously termed by some naturalists. They generally build not
far above the ground. Branches or twigs are bent, or partly broken,
and crossed, and the whole supported by the body of a limb or a
crotch. Sometimes a nest will be found near the 'end' of a 'strong
leafy branch' twenty or thirty feet from the ground. One I have lately
seen that could not be less than forty feet, and more probably it was
fifty. But this is an unusual height.

"Their dwelling-place is not permanent, but changed in pursuit of food
and solitude, according to the force of circumstances. We more often
see them in elevated places; but this arises from the fact that the low
grounds, being more favourable for the natives' rice-farms, are the
oftener cleared, and hence are almost always wanting in suitable trees
for their nests.... It is seldom that more than one or two nests are
seen upon the same tree, or in the same neighbourhood: five have been
found, but it was an unusual circumstance."...

"They are very filthy in their habits.... It is a tradition with the
natives generally here, that they were once members of their own tribe;
that for their depraved habits they were expelled from all human
society, and, that through an obstinate indulgence of their vile
propensities, they have degenerated into their present state and
organization. They are, however, eaten by them, and when cooked with
the oil and pulp of the palm-nut considered a highly palatable morsel.

"They exhibit a remarkable degree of intelligence in their habits, and,
on the part of the mother, much affection for their young. The second
female described was upon a tree when first discovered, with her mate
and two young ones (a male and a female). Her first impulse was to
descend with great rapidity, and make off into the thicket, with her
mate and female offspring. The young male remaining behind, she soon
returned to the rescue. She ascended and took him in her arms, at
which moment she was shot, the ball passing through the forearm of the
young one, on its way to the heart of the mother....

"In a recent case, the mother, when discovered, remained upon the tree
with her offspring, watching intently the movements of the hunter. As
he took aim, she motioned with her hand, precisely in the manner of a
human being, to have him desist and go away. When the wound has not
proved instantly fatal, they have been known to stop the flow of blood
by pressing with the hand upon the part, and when this did not succeed,
to apply leaves and grass.... When shot, they give a sudden screech,
not unlike that of a human being in sudden and acute distress."

The ordinary voice of the Chimpanzee, however, is affirmed to be hoarse,
guttural, and not very loud, somewhat like "whoo-whoo." (l. c. p. 365).

The analogy of the Chimpanzee to the Orang, in its nest-building habit
and in the mode of forming its nest, is exceedingly interesting; while,
on the other hand, the activity of this ape, and its tendency to bite,
are particulars in which it rather resembles the Gibbons. In extent of
geographical range, again, the Chimpanzees--which are found from Sierra
Leone to Congo--remind one of the Gibbons, rather than of either of the
other man-like apes; and it seems not unlikely that, as is the case
with the Gibbons, there may be several species spread over the
geographical area of the genus.

The same excellent observer, from whom I have borrowed the preceding
account of the habits of the adult Chimpanzee, published fifteen years
ago,* an account of the GORILLA, which has, in its most essential
points, been confirmed by subsequent observers, and to which so very
little has really been added, that in justice to Dr. Savage I give it
almost in full.

[footnote] *Notice of the external characters and habits of
Troglodytes Gorilla. 'Boston Journal of Natural History',

"It should be borne in mind that my account is based upon the statements
of the aborigines of that region (the Gaboon). In this connection, it
may also be proper for me to remark, that having been a missionary
resident for several years, studying, from habitual intercourse, the
African mind and character, I felt myself prepared to discriminate and
decide upon the probability of their statements. Besides, being
familiar with the history and habits of its interesting congener
('Trog. niger', Geoff.), I was able to separate their accounts of the
two animals, which, having the same locality and a similarity of habit,
are confounded in the minds of the mass, especially as but few--such as
traders to the interior and huntsmen--have ever seen the animal in

FIG. 10.--The Gorilla (after Wolff).

"The tribe from which our knowledge of the animal is derived, and whose
territory forms its habitat, is the 'Mpongwe', occupying both banks of
the River Gaboon, from its mouth to some fifty or sixty miles

"If the word 'Pongo' be of African origin, it is probably a corruption
of the word 'Mpongwe', the name of the tribe on the banks of the
Gaboon, and hence applied to the region they inhabit. Their local name
for the Chimpanzee is 'Enche-eko', as near as it can be Anglicized,
from which the common term 'Jocko' probably comes. The Mpongwe
appellation for its new congener is 'Enge-ena', prolonging the sound of
the first vowel, and slightly sounding the second.

"The habitat of the 'Enge-ena' is the interior of lower Guinea, whilst
that of the 'Enche-eko' is nearer the sea-board.

"Its height is about five feet; it is disproportionately broad across
the shoulders, thickly covered with coarse black hair, which is said to
be similar in its arrangement to that of the 'Enche-eko'; with age it
becomes grey, which fact has given rise to the report that both animals
are seen of different colours.

"'Head'.--The prominent features of the head are, the great width and
elongation of the face, the depth of the molar region, the branches of
the lower jaw being very deep and extending far backward, and the
comparative smallness of the cranial portion; the eyes are very large,
and said to be like those of the Enche-eko, a bright hazel; nose broad
and flat, slightly elevated towards the root; the muzzle broad, and
prominent lips and chin, with scattered gray hairs; the under lip
highly mobile, and capable of great elongation when the animal is
enraged, then hanging over the chin; skin of the face and ears naked,
and of a dark brown, approaching to black.

"The most remarkable feature of the head is a high ridge, or crest of
hair, in the course of the sagittal suture, which meets posteriorily
with a transverse ridge of the same, but less prominent, running round
from the back of one ear to the other. The animal has the power of
moving the scalp freely forward and back, and when enraged is said to
contract it strongly over the brow, thus bringing down the hairy ridge
and pointing the hair forward, so as to present an indescribably
ferocious aspect.

"Neck short, thick, and hairy; chest and shoulders very broad, said to
be fully double the size of the Enche-ekos; arms very long, reaching
some way below the knee--the fore-arm much the shortest; hands very
large, the thumbs much larger than the fingers....

FIG. 11.--Gorilla walking (after Wolff).

"The gait is shuffling; the motion of the body, which is never upright
as in man, but bent forward, is somewhat rolling, or from side to
side. The arms being longer than the Chimpanzee, it does not stoop as
much in walking; like that animal, it makes progression by thrusting
its arms forward, resting the hands on the ground, and then giving the
body a half jumping half swinging motion between them. In this act it
is said not to flex the fingers, as does the Chimpanzee, resting on its
knuckles, but to extend them, making a fulcrum of the hand. When it
assumes the walking posture, to which it is said to be much inclined, it
balances its huge body by flexing its arms upward.

"They live in bands, but are not so numerous as the Chimpanzees: the
females generally exceed the other sex in number. My informants all
agree in the assertion that but one adult male is seen in a band; that
when the young males grow up, a contest takes place for mastery, and
the strongest, by killing and driving out the others, establishes
himself as the head of the community."

Dr. Savage repudiates the stories about the Gorillas carrying off women
and vanquishing elephants and then adds:

"Their dwellings, if they may be so called, are similar to those of the
Chimpanzee, consisting simply of a few sticks and leafy branches,
supported by the crotches and limbs of trees: they afford no shelter,
and are occupied only at night.

"They are exceedingly ferocious, and always offensive in their habits,
never running from man, as does the Chimpanzee. They are objects of
terror to the natives, and are never encountered by them except on the
defensive. The few that have been captured were killed by elephant
hunters and native traders, as they came suddenly upon them while
passing through the forests.

"It is said that when the male is first seen he gives a terrific yell,
that resounds far and wide through the forest, something like kh-ah!
kh-ah! prolonged and shrill. His enormous jaws are widely opened at
each expiration, his under lip hangs over the chin, and the hairy ridge
and scalp are contracted upon the brow, presenting an aspect of
indescribable ferocity.

"The females and young, at the first cry, quickly disappear. He then
approaches the enemy in great fury, pouring out his horrid cries in
quick succession. The hunter awaits his approach with his gun
extended: if his aim is not sure, he permits the animal to grasp the
barrel, and as he carries it to his mouth (which is his habit) he
fires. Should the gun fail to go off, the barrel (that of the ordinary
musket, which is thin) is crushed between his teeth, and the encounter
soon proves fatal to the hunter.

"In the wild state, their habits are in general like those of the
'Troglodytes niger', building their nests loosely in trees, living on
similar fruits, and changing their place of resort from force of

Dr. Savage's observations were confirmed and supplemented by those of
Mr. Ford, who communicated an interesting paper on the Gorilla to the
Philadelphian Academy of Sciences, in 1852. With respect to the
geographical distribution of this greatest of all the man-like Apes,
Mr. Ford remarks:

"This animal inhabits the range of mountains that traverse the interior
of Guinea, from the Cameroon in the north, to Angola in the south, and
about 100 miles inland, and called by the geographers Crystal
Mountains. The limit to which this animal extends, either north or
south, I am unable to define. But that limit is doubtless some
distance north of this river [Gaboon]. I was able to certify myself of
this fact in a late excursion to the head-waters of the Mooney (Danger)
River, which comes into the sea some sixty miles from this place. I was
informed (credibly, I think) that they were numerous among the
mountains in which that river rises, and far north of that.

"In the south, this species extends to the Congo River, as I am told by
native traders who have visited the coast between the Gaboon and that
river. Beyond that, I am not informed. This animal is only found at a
distance from the coast in most cases, and, according to my best
information, approaches it nowhere so nearly as on the south side of
this river, where they have been found within ten miles of the sea.
This, however, is only of late occurrence. I am informed by some of
the oldest Mpongwe men that formerly he was only found on the sources
of the river, but that at present he may be found within half-a-day's
walk of its mouth. Formerly he inhabited the mountainous ridge where
Bushmen alone inhabited, but now he boldly approaches the Mpongwe
plantations. This is doubtless the reason of the scarcity of
information in years past, as the opportunities for receiving a
knowledge of the animal have not been wanting; traders having for one
hundred years frequented this river, and specimens, such as have been
brought here within a year, could not have been exhibited without
having attracted the attention of the most stupid."

One specimen Mr. Ford examined weighed 170 1bs., without the thoracic,
or pelvic, viscera, and measured four feet four inches round the
chest. This writer describes so minutely and graphically the onslaught
of the Gorilla--though he does not for a moment pretend to have
witnessed the scene--that I am tempted to give this part of his paper in
full, for comparison with other narratives:

"He always rises to his feet when making an attack, though he approaches
his antagonist in a stooping posture.

"Though he never lies in wait, yet, when he hears, sees, or scents a
man, he immediately utters his characteristic cry, prepares for an
attack, and always acts on the offensive. The cry he utters resembles
a grunt more than a growl, and is similar to the cry of the Chimpanzee,
when irritated, but vastly louder. It is said to be audible at a great
distance. His preparation consists in attending the females and young
ones, by whom he is usually accompanied, to a little distance. He,
however, soon returns, with his crest erect and projecting forward, his
nostrils dilated, and his under-lip thrown down; at the same time
uttering his characteristic yell, designed, it would seem, to terrify
his antagonist. Instantly, unless he is disabled by a well directed
shot, he makes an onset, and, striking his antagonist with the palm of
his hands, or seizing him with a grasp from which there is no escape,
he dashes him upon the ground, and lacerates him with his tusks.

"He is said to seize a musket, and instantly crush the barrel between
his teeth.... This animal's savage nature is very well shown by the
implacable desperation of a young one that was brought here. It was
taken very young, and kept four months, and many means were used to
tame it; but it was incorrigible, so that it bit me an hour before it

Mr. Ford discredits the house-building and elephant-driving stories, and
says that no well-informed natives believe them. They are tales told
to children.

I might quote other testimony to a similar effect, but, as it appears to
me, less carefully weighed and sifted, from the letters of MM. Franquet
and Gautier Laboullay, appended to the memoir of M. I. G. St. Hilaire,
which I have already cited.

Bearing in mind what is known regarding the Orang and the Gibbon, the
statements of Dr. Savage and Mr. Ford do not appear to me to be justly
open to criticism on 'a priori' grounds. The Gibbons, as we have seen,
readily assume the erect posture, but the Gorilla is far better fitted
by its organization for that attitude than are the Gibbons: if the
laryngeal pouches of the Gibbons, as is very likely, are important in
giving volume to a voice which can be heard for half a league, the
Gorilla, which has similar sacs, more largely developed, and whose bulk
is fivefold that of a Gibbon, may well be audible for twice that
distance. If the Orang fights with its hands, the Gibbons and
Chimpanzees with their teeth, the Gorilla may, probably enough, do
either or both; nor is there anything to be said against either
Chimpanzee or Gorilla building a nest, when it is proved that the
Orang-Utan habitually performs that feat.

With all this evidence, now ten to fifteen years old, before the world
it is not a little surprising that the assertions of a recent
traveller, who, so far as the Gorilla is concerned, really does very
little more than repeat, on his own authority, the statements of Savage
and of Ford, should have met with so much and such bitter opposition.
If subtraction be made of what was known before, the sum and substance
of what M. Du Chaillu has affirmed as a matter of his own observation
respecting the Gorilla, is, that, in advancing to the attack, the great
brute beats his chest with his fists. I confess I see nothing very
improbable, or very much worth disputing about, in this statement.

With respect to the other man-like Apes of Africa, M. Du Chaillu tells
us absolutely nothing, of his own knowledge, regarding the common
Chimpanzee; but he informs us of a bald-headed species or variety, the
'nschiego mbouve', which builds itself a shelter, and of another rare
kind with a comparatively small face, large facial angle, and peculiar
note, resembling "Kooloo."

As the Orang shelters itself with a rough coverlet of leaves, and the
common Chimpanzee, according to that eminently trustworthy observer Dr.
Savage, makes a sound like "Whoo-whoo,"--the grounds of the summary
repudiation with which M. Du Chaillu's statements on these matters have
been met are not obvious.

If I have abstained from quoting M. Du Chaillu's work, then, it is not
because I discern any inherent improbability in his assertions
respecting the man-like Apes; nor from any wish to throw suspicion on
his veracity; but because, in my opinion, so long as his narrative
remains in its present state of unexplained and apparently inexplicable
confusion, it has no claim to original authority respecting any subject

It may be truth, but it is not evidence.


Back to Full Books