The Book of Household Management
by
Mrs. Isabella Beeton
Part 34 out of 34
yet," says Lord St. Leonards, "a court of equity has held that it may be
specifically enforced as an agreement upon the terms stated." The law on
this point is one of glorious uncertainty; in making any such agreement,
therefore, we should be careful to express that it is an agreement, and
not a lease; and that it is witnessed and under seal.
2705. AGREEMENTS.--It is usual, where the lease is a repairing one, to
agree for a lease to be granted on completion of repairs according to
specification. This agreement should contain the names and designation
of the parties, a description of the property, and the term of the
intended lease, and all the covenants which are to be inserted, as no
verbal agreement can be made to a written agreement. It should also
declare that the instrument is an agreement for a lease, and not the
lease itself. The points to be settled in such an agreement are, the
rent, term, and especially covenants for insuring and rebuilding in the
event of a fire; and if it is intended that the lessor's consent is to
be obtained before assigning or underleasing, a covenant to that effect
is required in the agreement. In building-leases, usually granted for 99
years, the tenant is to insure the property; and even where the
agreement is silent on that point, the law decides it so. It is
otherwise with ordinary tenements, when the tenant pays a full, or what
the law terms rack-rent; the landlord is then to insure, unless it is
otherwise arranged by the agreement.
2706. It is important for lessee, and lessor, also, that the latter does
not exceed his powers. A lease granted by a tenant for life before he is
properly in possession, is void in law; for, although a court of equity,
according to Lord St. Leonards, will, "by force of its own jurisdiction,
support a _bona fide_ lease, granted under a power which is merely
erroneous in form or ceremonies," and the 12 & 13 Vict. c. 26, and 13 &
14 Vict. c. 19, compel a new lease to be granted with the necessary
variations, while the lessor has no power to compel him to accept such a
lease, except when the person in remainder is competent and willing to
confirm the original lease without variations, yet all these
difficulties involve both delay, costs, and anxieties.
2707. In husbandry leases, a covenant to cultivate the land in a
husbandlike manner, and according to the custom of the district, is
always implied; but it is more usual to prescribe the course of tillage
which is to be pursued. In the case of houses for occupation, the tenant
would have to keep the house in a tenantable state of repair during the
term, and deliver it up in like condition. This is not the case with the
tenant at will, or from year to year, where the landlord has to keep the
house in tenantable repair, and the tenant is only liable for waste
beyond reasonable wear and tear.
2708. INSURANCE.--Every lease, or agreement for a lease, should covenant
not only who is to pay insurance, but how the tenement is to be rebuilt
in the event of a fire; for if the house were burnt down, and no
provision made for insurance, the tenant, supposing there was the
ordinary covenant to repair in the lease, would not only have to
rebuild, but to pay rent while it was being rebuilt. More than this,
supposing, under the same lease, the landlord had taken the precaution
of insuring, he is not compelled to lay out the money recovered in
rebuilding the premises. Sir John Leach lays it down, that "the tenant's
situation could not be changed by a precaution, on the part of the
landlord, with which he had nothing to do." This decision Lord Campbell
confirmed in a more recent case, in which an action was brought against
a lessee who was not bound to repair, and neither he nor the landlord
bound to insure; admitting an equitable defence, the court affirmed Sir
John Leach's decision, holding that the tenant was bound to pay the
rent, and could not require the landlord to lay out the insurance money
in rebuilding. This is opposed to the opinion of Lord St. Leonards, who
admits, however, that the decision of the court must overrule his
_dictum_. Such being the state of the law, it is very important that
insurance should be provided for, and that the payment of rent should be
made to depend upon rebuilding the house in the event of a fire. Care
must be taken, however, that this is made a covenant of the lease, as
well as in the agreement, otherwise the tenant must rebuild the house.
2709. The law declares that a tenant is not bound to repair damages by
tempest, lightning, or other natural casualty, unless there is a special
covenant to that effect in the lease; but if there is a general covenant
to repair, the repair will fall upon the tenant. Lord Kenyon lays it
down, in the case of a bridge destroyed by a flood, the tenant being
under a general covenant to repair, that, "where a party, by his own
contract, creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it
good, because he might have guarded against it in the contract." The
same principle of law has been applied to a house destroyed by
lightning. It is, therefore, important to have this settled in the
insurance clause.
2710. Lord St. Leonards asserts that "his policies against fire are not
so framed as to render the company _legally_ liable." Generally the
property is inaccurately described with reference to the conditions
under which you insure. They are framed by companies who, probably, are
not unwilling to have a legal defence against any claim, as they intend
to pay what they deem just claim without taking advantage of any
technical objection, and intending to make use of their defence only
against what they believe to be a fraud, although they may not be able
to prove it. "But," says his lordship, "do not rely upon the moral
feelings of the directors. Ascertain that your house falls strictly
within the conditions. Even having the surveyor of the company to look
over your house before the insurance will not save you, unless your
policy is correct." This is true; but probably his lordship's legal
jealousy overshoots the mark here. Assurance companies only require an
honest statement of the facts, and that no concealment is practised with
their surveyor; and the case of his own, which he quotes, in which a
glass door led into a conservatory, rendering it, according to the view
of the company, "hazardous," and consequently voiding the policy, when a
fire did occur, the company paid, rather than try the question; but even
after the fire they demurred, when called upon, to make the description
correct and indorse on the policy the fact that the drawing-room opened
through a glass door into conservatories. One of two inferences is
obvious here; either his lordship has overcoloured the statement, or the
company could not be the respectable one represented. The practice with
all reputable offices is to survey the premises before insurance, and to
describe them as they appear; but no concealment of stoves, or other
dangerous accessories or inflammable goods, should be practised. This
certainly binds the office so long as no change takes place; but the
addition of any stove, opening, or door through a party wall, the
introduction of gunpowder, saltpetre, or other inflammable articles into
the premises without notice, very properly "voids the policy." The usual
course is to give notice of all alterations, and have them indorse on
the policy, as additions to the description of the property: there is
little fear, where this is honestly done, that any company would adopt
the sharp practice hinted at in Lord St. Leonards' excellent handy book.
2711. BREAKS IN THE LEASE.--Where a lease is for seven, fourteen, or
twenty-one years, the option to determine it at the end of the first
term is in the tenant, unless it is distinctly agreed that the option
shall be mutual, according to Lord St. Leonards.
2712. NOXIOUS TRADES.--A clause is usually introduced prohibiting the
carrying on of any trade in some houses, and of noxious or particular
trades in others. This clause should be jealously inspected, otherwise
great annoyance may be produced. It has been held that a general clause
of this description prohibited a tenant from keeping a school, for which
he had taken it, although a lunatic asylum and public-house have been
found admissible; the keeping an asylum not being deemed a trade, which
is defined as "conducted by buying and selling." It is better to have
the trades, or class of trades objected to, defined in the lease.
2713. FIXTURES.--In houses held under lease, it has been the practice
with landlords to lease the bare walls of the tenement only, leaving the
lessee to put in the stoves, cupboards, and such other conveniences as
he requires, at his own option. Those, except under particular
circumstances, are the property of the lessee, and may either be sold to
an incoming tenant, or removed at the end of his term. The articles
which may not be removed are subject to considerable doubt, and are a
fruitful source of dispute. Mr. Commissioner Fonblanque has defined as
tenants' property all goods and chattels; 2ndly, all articles "slightly
connected one with another, and with the freehold, but capable of being
separated without materially injuring the freehold;" 3rdly, articles
fixed to the freehold by nails and screws, bolts or pegs, are also
tenants' goods and chattels; but when sunk in the soil, or built on it,
they are integral parts of the freehold, and cannot be removed. Thus, a
greenhouse or conservatory attached to the house by the tenant is not
removable; but the furnace and hot-water pipes by which it is heated,
may be removed or sold to the in-coming tenant. A brick flue does not
come under the same category, but remains. Window-blinds, grates,
stoves, coffee-mills, and, in a general sense, everything he has placed
which can be removed without injury to the freehold, he may remove, if
they are separated from the tenement during his term, and the place made
good. It is not unusual to leave the fixtures in their place, with an
undertaking from the landlord that, when again let, the in-coming tenant
shall pay for them, or permit their removal. In a recent case, however,
a tenant having held over beyond his term and not removed his fixtures,
the landlord let the premises to a new tenant, who entered into
possession, and would not allow the fixtures to be removed--it was held
by the courts, on trial, that he was justified. A similar case occurred
to the writer: he left his fixtures in the house, taking a letter from
the landlord, undertaking that the in-coming tenant should pay for them
by valuation, or permit their removal. The house was let; the landlord
died. His executors, on being applied to, pleaded ignorance, as did the
tenant, and on being furnished with a copy of the letter, the executors
told applicant that if he was aggrieved, he knew his remedy; namely, an
action at law. He thought the first loss the least, and has not altered
his opinion.
2714. TAXES.--Land-tax, sewers-rate, and property-tax, are landlord's
taxes; but by 30 Geo. II. c. 2, the occupier is required to pay all
rates levied, and deduct from the rent such taxes as belong to the
landlord. Many landlords now insert a covenant, stipulating that
land-tax and sewers-rate are to be paid by the tenants, and not
deducted: this does not apply to the property-tax. All other taxes and
rates are payable by the occupier.
2715. WATER-RATE, of course, is paid by the tenant. The water-companies,
as well as gas-companies, have the power of cutting off the supply; and
most of them have also the right of distraining, in the same manner as
landlords have for rent.
2716. NOTICE TO QUIT.--In the case of leasing for a term, no notice is
necessary; the tenant quits, as a matter of course, at its termination;
or if, by tacit consent, he remains paying rent as heretofore, he
becomes a tenant at sufferance, or from year to year. Half a year's
notice now becomes necessary, as we have already seen, to terminate the
tenancy; except in London, and the rent is under forty shillings, when a
quarter's notice is sufficient. Either of these notices may be given
verbally, if it can be proved that the notice was definite, and given at
the right time. Form of notice is quite immaterial, provided it is
definite and clear in its purport.
2717. Tenancy for less than a year may be terminated according to the
taking. Thus, when taken for three months, a three months' notice is
required; when monthly, a month's notice; and when weekly, a week's
notice; but weekly tenancy is changed to a quarterly tenure if the rent
is allowed to stand over for three months. When taken for a definite
time, as a month, a week, or a quarter, no notice is necessary on either
side.
2718. DILAPIDATIONS.--At the termination of a lease, supposing he has
not done so before, a landlord can, and usually does, send a surveyor to
report upon the condition of the tenement, and it becomes his duty to
ferret out every defect. A litigious landlord may drag the outgoing
tenant into an expensive lawsuit, which he has no power to prevent. He
may even compel him to pay for repairing improvements which he has
effected in the tenement itself, if dilapidations exist. When the lessor
covenants to do all repairs, and fails to do so, the lessee may repair,
and deduct the cost from the rent.
2719. RECOVERY OF RENT.--The remedies placed in the hands of landlords
are very stringent. The day after rent falls due, he may proceed to
recover it, by action at law, by distress on the premises, or by action
of ejectment, if the rent is half a year in arrear. Distress is the
remedy usually applied, the landlord being authorized to enter the
premises, seize the goods and chattels of his tenant, and sell them, on
the fifth day, to reimburse himself for all arrears of rent and the
charges of the distress. There are a few exceptions; but, generally, all
goods found on the premises may be seized. The exceptions are--dogs,
rabbits, poultry, fish, tools and implements of a man's trade actually
in use, the books of a scholar, the axe of a carpenter, wearing apparel
on the person, a horse at the plough, or a horse he may be riding, a
watch in the pocket, loose money, deeds, writings, the cattle at a
smithy forge, corn sent to a mill for grinding, cattle and goods of a
guest at an inn; but, curiously enough, carriages and horses standing at
livery at the same inn may be taken. Distress can only be levied in the
daytime, and if made after the tender of arrears, it is illegal. If
tender is made after the distress, but before it is _impounded_, the
landlord must abandon the distress and bear the cost himself. Nothing of
a perishable nature, which cannot be restored in the same condition--as
milk, fruit, and the like, must be taken.
2720. The law does not regard a day as consisting of portions. The
popular notion that a notice to quit should be served before noon is an
error. Although distraint is one of the remedies, it is seldom advisable
in a landlord to resort to distraining for the recovery of rent. If a
tenant cannot pay his rent, the sooner he leaves the premises the
better. If he be a rogue and won't pay, he will probably know that nine
out of ten distresses are illegal, through the carelessness, ignorance,
or extortion of the brokers who execute them. Many, if not most, of the
respectable brokers will not execute distresses, and the business falls
into the hands of persons whom it is by no means desirable to employ.
2721. Powers to relieve landlords of premises, by giving them legal
possession, are given by 19 & 20 Vict., cap. 108, to the county courts,
in cases where the rent does not exceed L50 per annum, and under the
circumstances hereinafter mentioned; i.e.:--
1. Where the term has expired, or been determined by notice to
quit.
2. Where there is one half-year's rent in arrear, and _the
landlord shall have right by law to enter for the nonpayment
thereof_. As proof of this power is required, the importance of
including such a power in the agreement for tenancy will be
obvious.
In the county courts the amount of rent due may be claimed, as well as
the possession of the premises, in one summons.
2722. When a tenant deserts premises, leaving one half-year's rent in
arrear, possession may be recovered by means of the police-court. The
rent must not exceed L20 per annum, and must be at least three-fourths
of the value of the premises. In cases in which the tenant has not
deserted the premises, and where notice to quit has been given and has
expired, the landlord must give notice to the tenant of his intended
application. The annual rent in this case, also, must not exceed L20.
2723. THE I. O. U.--The law is not particular as to orthography; in
fact, it distinctly refuses to recognize the existence of that
delightful science. You may bring your action against Mr. Jacob
Phillips, under the fanciful denomination of Jaycobb Fillipse, if you
like, and the law won't care, because the law goes by ear; and, although
it insists upon having everything written, things written are only
supposed in law to have any meaning when read, which is, after all, a
common-sense rule enough. So, instead of "I owe you," persons of a
cheerful disposition, so frequently found connected with debt, used to
write facetiously I. O. U., and the law approved of their so doing. An
I. O. U. is nothing more than a written admission of a debt, and may run
thus:--
15th October, 1860.
To Mr. W. BROWN.
I. O. U. ten pounds for coals.
L10. JOHN JONES.
If to this you add the time of payment, as "payable in one month from
this date," your I. O. U. is worthless and illegal; for it thus ceases
to be a mere acknowledgment, and becomes a promissory note. Now a
promissory note requires a stamp, which an I. O. U. does not. Many
persons, nevertheless, stick penny stamps upon them, probably for
ornamental effect, or to make them look serious and authoritative. If
for the former purpose, the postage-stamp looks better than the receipt
stamp upon blue paper. If you are W. Brown, and you didn't see the I. O.
U. signed, and can't find anybody who knows Jones's autograph, and Jones
won't pay, the I. O. U. will be of no use to you in the county court,
except to make the judge laugh. He will, however, allow you to prove the
consideration, and as, of course, you won't be prepared to do anything
of the sort, he will, if you ask him politely, adjourn the hearing for a
week, when you can produce the coalheavers who delivered the article,
and thus gain a glorious victory.
2724. APPRENTICES.--By the statute 5 Eliz. cap. 4, it is enacted that,
in cases of ill-usage by masters towards apprentices, or of neglect of
duty by apprentices, the complaining party may apply to a justice of the
peace, who may make such order as equity may require. If, for want of
conformity on the part of the master, this cannot be done, then the
master may be bound to appear at the next sessions. Authority is given
by the act to the justices in sessions to discharge the apprentice from
his indentures. They are also empowered, on proof of misbehaviour of the
apprentice, to order him to be corrected or imprisoned with hard labour.
2725. HUSBAND AND WIFE.--Contrary to the vulgar opinion, second cousins,
as well as first, may legally marry. When married, a husband is liable
for his wife's debts contracted before marriage. A creditor desirous of
suing for such a claim should proceed against both. It will, however, be
sufficient if the husband be served with process, the names of both
appearing therein, thus:--John Jones and Ann his wife. A married woman,
if sued alone, may plead her marriage, or, as it is called in law,
coverture. The husband is liable for debts of his wife contracted for
necessaries while living with him. If she voluntarily leaves his
protection, this liability ceases. He is also liable for any debts
contracted by her with his authority. If the husband have abjured the
realm, or been transported by a sentence of law, the wife is liable
during his absence, as if she were a single woman, for debts contracted
by her.
2726. In civil cases, a wife may now give evidence on behalf of her
husband in criminal cases she can neither be a witness for or against
her husband. The case of assault by him upon her forms an exception to
this rule.
2727. The law does not at this day admit the ancient principle of
allowing moderate correction by a husband upon the person of his wife.
Although this is said to have been anciently limited to the use of "a
stick not bigger than the thumb," this barbarity is now altogether
exploded. He may, notwithstanding, as has been recently shown in the
famous Agapemone case, keep her under restraint, to prevent her leaving
him, provided this be effected without cruelty.
2728. By the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, a wife deserted
by her husband may apply to a magistrate, or to the petty sessions, for
an order to protect her lawful earnings or property acquired by her
after such desertion, from her husband and his creditors. In this case
it is indispensable that such order shall, within ten days, be entered
at the county court of the district within which she resides. It will be
seen that the basis of an application for such an order is _desertion_.
Consequently, where the parties have separated by common consent, such
an order cannot be obtained, any previous cruelty or misconduct on the
husband's part notwithstanding.
2729. When a husband allows his wife to invest money in her own name in
a savings-bank, and he survives her, it is sometimes the rule of such
establishments to compel him to take out administration in order to
receive such money, although it is questionable whether such rule is
legally justifiable. Widows and widowers pay no legacy-duty for property
coming to them through their deceased partners.
2730. RECEIPTS for sums above L2 should now be given upon penny stamps.
A bill of exchange may nevertheless be discharged by an indorsement
stating that it has been paid, and this will not be liable to the stamp.
A receipt is not, as commonly supposed, conclusive evidence as to a
payment. It is only what the law terms _prima facie_ evidence; that is,
good until contradicted or explained. Thus, if A sends wares or
merchandise to B, with a receipt, as a hint that the transaction is
intended to be for ready money, and B detain the receipt without paying
the cash, A will be at liberty to prove the circumstances and to recover
his claim. The evidence to rebut the receipt must, however, be clear and
indubitable, as, after all, written evidence is of a stronger nature
than oral testimony.
2731. BOOKS OF ACCOUNT.--A tradesman's books of account cannot be
received as evidence in his own behalf, unless the entries therein be
proved to have been brought under the notice of, and admitted to be
correct by the other party, as is commonly the case with the
"pass-books" employed backwards and forwards between bakers, butchers,
and the like domestic traders, and their customers. The defendant may,
however, compel the tradesman to produce his books to show entries
adverse to his own claim.
2732. WILLS.--The last proof of affection which we can give to those left
behind, is to leave their worldly affairs in such a state as to excite
neither jealousy, nor anger, nor heartrendings of any kind, at least for
the immediate future. This can only be done by a just, clear, and
intelligible disposal of whatever there is to leave. Without being
advocates for every man being his own lawyer, it is not to be denied
that the most elaborately prepared wills have been the most fruitful
sources of litigation, and it has even happened that learned judges left
wills behind them which could not be carried out. Except in cases where
the property is in land or in leases of complicated tenure, very
elaborate details are unnecessary; and we counsel no man to use words in
making his will of which he does not perfectly understand the meaning
and import.
2733. All men over twenty-one years of age, and of sound mind, and all
unmarried women of like age and sanity, may by will bequeath their
property to whom they please. Infants, that is, all persons under
twenty-one years of age, and married women, except where they have an
estate to their "own separate use," are incapacitated, without the
concurrence of the husband; the law taking the disposal of any property
they die possessed of. A person born deaf and dumb cannot make a will,
unless there is evidence that he could read and comprehend its contents.
A person convicted of felony cannot make a will, unless subsequently
pardoned; neither can persons outlawed; but the wife of a felon
transported for life may make a will, and act in all respects as if she
were unmarried. A suicide may bequeath real estate, but personal
property is forfeited to the crown.
2734. Except in the case of soldiers on actual service, and sailors at
sea, every will must be made in writing. It must be signed by the
testator, or by some other person in his presence, and at his request,
and the signature must be made or acknowledged in the presence of two or
more witnesses, who are required to be present at the same time, who
declare by signing that the will was signed by the testator, or
acknowledged in their presence, and that they signed as witnesses in
testator's presence.
2735. By the act of 1852 it was enacted that no will shall be valid
unless signed at the foot or end thereof by the testator, or by some
person in his presence, and by his direction; but a subsequent act
proceeds to say that every will shall, as far only as regards the
position of the signature of the testator, or of the person signing for
him, be deemed valid if the signature shall be so placed at, or after,
or following, or under, or beside, or opposite to the end of the will,
that it shall be apparent on the face of it that the testator intended
to give it effect by such signature. Under this clause, a will of
several sheets, all of which were duly signed, except the last one, has
been refused probate; while, on the other hand, a similar document has
been admitted to probate where the last sheet only, and none of the
other sheets, was signed. In order to be perfectly formal, however, each
separate sheet should be numbered, signed, and witnessed, and attested
on the last sheet. This witnessing is an important act: the witnesses
must subscribe it in the presence of the testator and of each other; and
by their signature they testify to having witnessed the signature of the
testator, he being in sound mind at the time. Wills made under any kind
of coercion, or even importunity may become void, being contrary to the
wishes of the testator. Fraud or imposition also renders a will void,
and where two wills made by the same person happen to exist, neither of
them dated, the maker of the wills is declared to have died intestate.
2736. A will may always be revoked and annulled, but only by burning or
entirely destroying the writing, or by adding a codicil, or making a
subsequent will duly attested; but as the alteration of a will is only a
revocation to the extent of the alteration, if it is intended to revoke
the original will entirely, such intention should be declared,--no
merely verbal directions can revoke a written will; and the act of
running the pen through the signatures, or down the page, is not
sufficient to cancel it, without a written declaration to that effect
signed and witnessed.
2737. A will made before marriage is revoked thereby.
2738. A codicil is a supplement or addition to a will, either explaining
or altering former dispositions; it may be written on the same or
separate paper, and is to be witnessed and attested in the same manner
as the original document.
2739. WITNESSES.--Any persons are qualified to witness a will who can
write their names; but such witness cannot be benefitted by the will. If
a legacy is granted to the persons witnessing, it is void. The same rule
applies to the husband or wife of a witness; a bequest made to either of
these is void.
2740. FORM OF WILLS.--Form is unimportant, provided the testator's
intention is clear. It should commence with his designation; that is,
his name and surname, place of abode, profession, or occupation. The
legatees should also be clearly described. In leaving a legacy to a
married woman, if no trustees are appointed over it, and no specific
directions given, "that it is for her sole and separate use, free from
the control, debts, and incumbrances of her husband," the husband will
be entitled to the legacy. In the same manner a legacy to an unmarried
woman will vest in her husband after marriage, unless a settlement of it
is made on her before marriage.
2741. In sudden emergencies a form may be useful, and the following has
been considered a good one for a death-bed will, where the assistance of
a solicitor could not be obtained; indeed, few solicitors can prepare a
will on the spur of the moment: they require time and legal forms, which
are by no means necessary, before they can act.
I, A.B., of No. 10, ----, Street, in the city of ----
[gentleman, builder, or grocer, as the case may be,] being of
sound mind, thus publish and declare my last will and testament.
Revoking and annulling all former dispositions of my property, I
give and bequeath as follows:--to my son J.B., of ----, I give
and bequeath the sum of ---; to my daughter M., the wife of J.,
of ----, I give and bequeath the sum of ---- [if intended for
her own use, add "to her sole and separate use, free from the
control, debts, and incumbrances of her husband"], both in
addition to any sum or sums of money or other property they have
before had from me. All the remaining property I die possessed
of I leave to my dear wife M. B., for her sole and separate use
during her natural life, together with my house and furniture,
situate at No. 10, ---- Street, aforesaid. At her death, I
desire that the said house shall be sold, with all the goods and
chattels therein [or, I give and bequeath the said house, with
all the goods and chattels therein, to ----], and the money
realized from the sale, together with that in which my said wife
had a life-interest, I give and bequeath in equal moieties to my
son and daughter before named. I appoint my dear friend T.S., of
----, and T.B., of ----, together with my wife M.B., as
executors to this my last will and testament.
Signed by A.B., this 10th day of October, 1861, in our presence,
both being present together, and both having signed as
witnesses, in the presence of the testator:--A.B.
T.S., Witness. F.M., Witness.
It is to be observed that the signature of the testator after this
attestation has been signed by the witnesses, is not a compliance with
the act; he must sign first.
2742. STAMP-DUTIES.--In the case of persons dying intestate, when their
effects are administered to by their family, the stamp-duty is half as
much more as it would have been under a will. Freehold and copyhold
estates are now subject to a special impost on passing, by the Stamp Act
of 1857.
2743. The legacy-duty only commences when it amounts to L20 and upwards;
and where it is not directed otherwise, the duty is deducted from the
legacy.
2744. You cannot compound for past absence of charity by bequeathing
land or tenements, or money to purchase such, to any charitable use, by
your last will and testament; but you may devise them to the British
Museum, to either of the two universities of Oxford and Cambridge, to
Eton, Winchester, and Westminster; and you may, if so inclined, leave it
for the augmentation of Queen Anne's bounty. You may, however, order
your executors to sell land and hand over the money received to any
charitable institution.
2745. In making provision for a wife, state whether it is in lieu of, or
in addition to, dower.
2746. If you have advanced money to any child, and taken an
acknowledgment for it, or entered it in any book of account, you should
declare whether any legacy left by will is in addition to such advance,
or whether it is to be deducted from the legacy.
2747. A legacy left by will to any one would be cancelled by your
leaving another legacy by a codicil to the same person, unless it is
stated to be in addition to the former bequest.
2748. Your entire estate is chargeable with your debts, except where the
real estate is settled. Let it be distinctly stated out of which
property, the real or personal, they are paid, where it consists of
both.
2749. Whatever is _devised_, let the intention be clearly expressed, and
without any condition, if you intend it to take effect.
2750. Attestation is not necessary to a will, as the act of witnessing
is all the law requires, and the will itself declares the testator to be
of sound mind in his own estimation; but, wherever there are erasures or
interlineations, one becomes necessary. No particular form is
prescribed; but it should state that the testator either signed it
himself, or that another signed it by his request, or that he
acknowledged the signature to be his in their presence, both being
present together, and signed as witnesses in his presence. When there
are erasures, the attestation must declare that--The words interlined in
the third line of page 4, and the erasure in the fifth line of page 6,
having been first made. These are the acts necessary to make a properly
executed will; and, being simple in themselves and easily performed,
they should be strictly complied with, and always attested.
2751. A witness may, on being requested, sign for testator; and he may
also sign for his fellow-witness, supposing he can only make his mark,
declaring that he does so; but a husband cannot sign for his wife,
either as testator or witness, nor can a wife for her husband.
Back to Full Books
|